Title: How many 5 year olds can you take in a fight?
Alfred E. Neuman - April 9, 2008 01:04 AM (GMT)
Iowahorse - April 9, 2008 01:07 AM (GMT)
34 snot snifflers here. I'll kill them all.
swanlee - April 9, 2008 01:38 AM (GMT)
31 dead toddlers for me
BlackTalon - April 9, 2008 01:51 AM (GMT)
30
Steve_Bartkowski - April 9, 2008 02:25 AM (GMT)
28...I guess I'm not vicious enough...
Flight58 - April 9, 2008 02:44 AM (GMT)
I got 28 because of the balance, but I will not hesitate to pick up a child and use it as a weapon -- Hell, that sounds like fun
678hnn77
678hnn77
falconfoozball - April 9, 2008 03:00 AM (GMT)
22. I think it's cause I'm tall, and have zero martial arts training. Exposes the shins way too much. Plus I'd only use them as a weapon if they attacked first.
Iowahorse - April 9, 2008 03:07 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (falconfoozball @ Apr 8 2008, 09:00 PM) |
| 22. I think it's cause I'm tall, and have zero martial arts training. Exposes the shins way too much. Plus I'd only use them as a weapon if they attacked first. |
That's why you failed. Junior cannon fodder. All of them.
falconfoozball - April 9, 2008 03:12 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iowahorse @ Apr 8 2008, 09:07 PM) | ||
That's why you failed. Junior cannon fodder. All of them. |
It's not really failing if the rest of them run away crying to mommy after they see 22 get their asses kicked. nr6
Steve_Bartkowski - April 9, 2008 03:13 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (falconfoozball @ Apr 8 2008, 09:00 PM) |
| 22. I think it's cause I'm tall, and have zero martial arts training. Exposes the shins way too much. Plus I'd only use them as a weapon if they attacked first. |
I'm 6 foot 3 and 235 with limited martial arts training. I think I lost points because I wouldn't just destroy little kids... But I *would* defend myself...
Iowahorse - April 9, 2008 03:13 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (falconfoozball @ Apr 8 2008, 09:12 PM) | ||||
It's not really failing if the rest of them run away crying to mommy after they see 22 get their asses kicked. nr6 |
Either that or the rest of them got you while gloating on your manly 22 kid "victory".
:lol: :lol:
falconfoozball - April 9, 2008 03:17 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iowahorse @ Apr 8 2008, 09:13 PM) | ||||||
Either that or the rest of them got you while gloating on your manly 22 kid "victory". :lol: :lol: |
Damn Straight!!!
Hell, my 7 yr. old practically kicks my azz on the regular. He fights dirty, though. Which is fine since I'm about 3x his size.
BnB - April 9, 2008 03:22 AM (GMT)
24...are these kids insurgents or your basic complacent American video game addicted junk food gorging couch potatoes?
Steve_Bartkowski - April 9, 2008 03:23 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (BnB @ Apr 8 2008, 09:22 PM) |
| 24...are these kids insurgents or your basic complacent American video game addicted junk food gorging couch potatoes? |
That WOULD make a difference...
NLF - April 9, 2008 04:03 AM (GMT)
I only got 20! Guess I'm just too damn good hearted!! lol
Flight58 - April 9, 2008 04:13 AM (GMT)
Can we taze them?
Iowahorse - April 9, 2008 04:21 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flight58 @ Apr 8 2008, 10:13 PM) |
| Can we taze them? |
That would be awesome.
etifan - April 9, 2008 03:08 PM (GMT)
29. I think I lost points for my size. After spending an hour at ToysR Us last night, I have no problem using the little hellions as weapons.
BrockSamson3000 - April 9, 2008 06:25 PM (GMT)
I did this awhile back on the OMB. Got a 32 I think.
Apparently, I'm too nice.
Though I think the top number is only 36, which is horseshit. Clearly that site doesn't take fighting five year olds seriously enough.
Apparently, I'm too nice.
Though I think the top number is only 36, which is horseshit. Clearly that site doesn't take fighting five year olds seriously enough.
Iowahorse - April 9, 2008 06:34 PM (GMT)
According to that site, another test I took, the Human Shield, my body is only 58% effective as a human shield. I dunno if that's good or bad...
Iowahorse - April 10, 2008 06:31 AM (GMT)
It's how I roll...
