View Full Version: Krystal: What do you think of her?

Starfox Unlimited > Starfox Chat > Krystal: What do you think of her?


Title: Krystal: What do you think of her?
Description: Blue foxes? That's just silly!


Beau Skunky - November 3, 2009 01:17 PM (GMT)
:krys: I voted both 5 & 6 personally. I'm pretty neutral with her character.

Sence this has come up in several topics, I decided to make this poll.
Let's face it, like her, or not, Krystal is the most controversial Star Fox character out there. (Not even Slippy compares.)

Personally, I'm not to bothered by her existence, but I feel her character is a bit shallow in the sence, unlike most SF characters, her history & personality isn't elaborated on much.
She's pretty much become the "token hot chick" character of the series after SFAdventures, and a slight replacement for Peppy on the team. (Though Peppy still gives advice.) She did show she could be a relyable teamate for the Star Fox team in SFAssault, but she did feel a bit "thrown-in."

In SFCommand they did kinda give her a li'l more character development, by having her form a relationship with Fox, and having Fox break up with her, (prior to the events of the game) adding a bit of tension between the two when they meet up in the numerous game story paths.
It gave her a bit more personality, but it also yeilded some unlikeable traits about her, with the somewhat "stubborn" attitude they gave her. (Thus raising dislike for her amongst alot of SF fans, and made some people want less-character development for her.)
It's sad when her onley likeable asset is her "figure," and not much else. She has shown at some points in some games she can be a nice person though.

Still, I think it's a li'l silly for some SF fans to blame the "decline" in quality of the series solelly on her. (I still enjoyed Assault & such personally.)
I also don't think getting rid of her, at this point of the SF series would help make SF "better" honestlly. It might even turn off her fans, as well as people who're getting tired of them getting rid of, or killing certain SF characters off.
(I kinda miss General Pepper, personally, I hope he comes back.)

Your thoughts?
NOTE: Also, please be respectable of other people's opinions, and no needless/constant Krystal-bashing. At least state why you don't like, or like her. Just going "Gaaahh she must die" makes you look silly & like a fanbrat.

Mad But Happy - November 3, 2009 06:05 PM (GMT)
6: She needs more character & personality. Then I'll like her better.

Pretty much that. Her personality chages in every game... and it she's totally bi-polar in Command.

Many of her fans annoy me, as well. So that's why I encourage Krystal being taken away from the series.

If they can make her more interesting, and less annoying, then sure. But that's not really the case at the moment.

Evil faucet person - November 3, 2009 06:56 PM (GMT)
She's a cancer on the series. One that needs to be surgically removed as soon as possible.

Beau Skunky - November 3, 2009 11:06 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Beau Skunky @ Nov 3 2009, 01:17 PM)
At least state why you don't like, or like her.

Ah-hem...

I kinda agree with Anna, they need to give her one stable personality, and not several confusing ones like in SFC. (It doesn't exactlly make her more likeable.)
Though, I don't think just getting rid of her altogether will really aid the series that well, as I said already.
(Plus it'll make her "rabid fans" mad, and I'd rather not see a bunch of whiney fanboys on the internet upset about her removal from the games personally.) But if Nintendo decides to "off" her somehow, so be it.
(But after the deaths & fake-out deaths in Assault, and such, I'm getting a li'l tired of characters getting killed in the SF series. I'd rather Star Fox not become some huge space soap opra.)

I honestlly haven't run into that many crazy Krystal-fans, (most of the ones I met are sane, and not pervy) but I must admit, I haven't been really been going to other SF-related message boards in recent years.

Evil faucet person - November 4, 2009 12:04 AM (GMT)
Do I need to explain as to why I think Krystal needs to be removed? She's a useless slut. All she has done was cause more problems and corrupt the fanbase. Don't count on the developers doing anything more than giving her a more suggestive costume. Who needs decent character traits when you can make lots of money off of furries? Nintendo should seriously just axe her. I doubt many would miss the people that would leave because no more Krystal.

Mad But Happy - November 4, 2009 06:49 AM (GMT)
If they made Krstal more interesting, I would be able to ignore her fans more. But I don't like her that much AND her fans are annoying, so it's a lose-lose situation.

But if they took her away totally, they would bitch until the end of time. So I dunno'. XD

Evil faucet person - November 4, 2009 06:50 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Mad But Happy @ Nov 4 2009, 06:49 AM)
If they made Krstal more interesting, I would be able to ignore her fans more. But I don't like her that much AND her fans are annoying, so it's a lose-lose situation.

But if they took her away totally, they would bitch until the end of time. So I dunno'. XD

I would happily guide them to the door and smile as I wave good bye ^_^ .

Mad But Happy - November 4, 2009 11:33 PM (GMT)
You honestly think they would leave?

This is the internet, Rage.

They would bitch for the next 10 years. XD

Beau Skunky - November 5, 2009 01:07 PM (GMT)
It's almost like the internet was made for bitching, I tell you. :P

It's why the AVGN and such dorks are so popular.

Evil faucet person - November 6, 2009 05:04 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Beau Skunky @ Nov 5 2009, 01:07 PM)
It's almost like the internet was made for bitching, I tell you. :P

It's why the AVGN and such dorks are so popular.

You are one to call someone a dork :P

Marshmellow_Center - November 7, 2009 07:00 PM (GMT)
We're all dorks here!

I picked option #4 ^^




Hosted for free by InvisionFree