Aids Unveiled: Population Reduction

Kjeld Heising – June 3, 2007

Friends and critics, it's time to cast some light on the issue of hiv and aids. So far, no one to my knowledge has taken the bull by the horns, probably due to some kind of compassion for the victims. But both the scientific world and the critical media world has now gathered so much documentation that there is no longer any doubt: The concept of hiv and aids is a fraud.

Here are some simple facts that even your mainstream doctor can confirm for you: No hiv virus has up to now been isolated from any living being. No image of any hiv virus from any electron microscope has been published - despite billions of dollars put into research. If your doctor contradicts this, ask him for a reference. You won't get any.

Aids itself is no disease. It is an umbrella for a various selections of classic diseases, from pneumonia and diarrhea to hepatitis, malaria, tuberculosis, certain cancers and many more. In fact, different countries have different criteria - some operate with 19 diseases, others up to 60 diseases. The very definition of aids is one of these diseases when accompanied by a positive hiv test.

Now, ask your doctor about the hiv test. He will tell you there are two types: The Elisa test and the Western Blot, the Elisa being the oldest. He may add that a third test can be performed, the viral load test based on the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) invented by Nobel prize laudate Kary Mullis.

Most people think these test actually test for a virus presence - they don't. The two of them test for the occurrece of antibodies in your blood as a response to certain proteins induced. Your doctor will say: proteins that are believed to resemble hiv proteins. Again and again highly qualified microbiologists, virologists and other researchers have pointed out that these proteins are not specific to any particular virus. That antibodies do not form for specific microbes but to varieties of microbes. Thus, more than sixty conditions are documented to react to the hiv test. Among them: common flu, flu vaccination and other vaccinations, recent blood transfusion, malaria, alcoholism, drug abuse, liver deceases, having once had herpes and many more. Worst of all: Pregnancy of perfectly healthy women can also react on the tests and give a positive outcome.

Concerning the PCR, we have the inventors's word that this can under no circumstance say anything about the presence of an hiv virus. Actually, Kary Mullis is a leading sceptic on the hiv-aids-setup. So, ladies and gentlemen, we are talking about a disease based on a never documented virus, diagnosed by a couple of unspecific, and thus useless, tests reacting on a variety of body conditions.

And it is getting worse: In Africa, WHO has implemented a special diagnostics technique. Since hiv tests are far too expensive, the WHO has approved The Visual Diagnosis: Has a person lost 10% of his weight, has he fever or persisting diarrhea, eventually accompanied by skin itching? Well, then he has aids. Period.

Now, can you understand how the number of hiv-infected persons are reported so high in Africa (the same applies to South East Asia)? While simple poverty related deceases become completely ignored? And do you get the point - there is an agenda running that has nothing to do with a virus?

Now, look at the ghost itself: The Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, AIDS. Technically defined as one of 19-60 classic deceases accompanied by a positive hiv test. Among most people understood as a general loss of immunity, an open door for any infection. So, there is no specific symptom tied to an "hiv virus", there's only the fact that the patient does not get better but worse.

There is no mystique here. The getting worse can have two reasons. Either the person is generally weakened by malnutrition or by the classic decease being cronical and untreated. Or the person has been prescribed aids drugs. Look at the latter.

The most common aids drug is Azidothymidine, shortened AZT. This drug was developed in 1964 as a chemotherapy for cancer treatment. It was discarded before it reached the market, since already in the lab the test animals simply died of the drug. AZT is considered the most toxic drug ever invented in the medical world. It has no viral oriented effect, it is simply a cell poison, working by terminating all DNA synthesis in all living cells. And unlike cancer chemotherapy which is prescribed for a couple of weeks and never more, the aids treatment is prescribed for the rest of the person's life. A deadly toxic drug ... the rest of life.

Maybe you can recall the images of the skeletons on the hospital: Skin and bone, hair falling off, skin rash, pain all over the body. Slowly and painfully dieing. Maybe you even had a friend there. Think of the officially recognised list of effects of the aids drug: Destruction of bone marrow and consequently anaemia and - since the immune system is also formed in the bone marrow - collaps of the immune system. Destruction of the intestines's ability to take up food followed by weight loss. Stomach pain, back pain, chest pain, lip edema, fever, flu symptoms, bleeding gums, diarrhea, liver failure, depression, confusion and much more.

Now, add it all up: People get sick from an alleged virus never documented, diagnosed by unspecific tests, treated with deadly toxic drugs causing exactly the symptoms the "disease" is said to produce. What do you get out of that?

You could think, it's not possible - but not for long. Firstly, there are other examples of such "diseases"; so many that they have a name: Iatrogenic diseases. The 1950-75 Japanese SMON was one of them. Maybe you also remember the Swine Flu from the 1970'ies, and sure, you have heard of the Pentagon Bird Flu stunt from the last couple of years. And of course, you know it's all about money. And war.

Secondly, think of the now well understood agenda of population control, excercised more or less openly in the third world (mass murder through medication), but also increasingly open in the west - following the general police state formation. In the UK, a mandatory hiv test for all pregnant women is underway, the same in the US. Forced prescription of deadly toxic drugs - or children taken away from their mothers if they refuse - will follow. Now, compare with the fact that pregnancy often gives a false positive hiv test and conclude: This is legalised murder. Compare with the completely unscientific foundation of the whole hiv-aids-plot and conclude: This is population reduction - going on right in front of our eyes.

And it actually goes to the core. It is common antropology that if you wish to reduce a population, you must kill the women. Killing the men has a very temporary effect.

The good news is that more and more scientists are discovering the scam. The amount of sources and documentation is growing fast. Still better, more and more common people who have been diagnosed hiv positive have seen through it. Instead of blindly taking the doctors toxic drugs they go on the Net, make their research and end up flushing the drugs in the toilet never to touch it again. Enough accounts are now available to see the pattern: These people are today alive and perfectly well while their fellow drug users get thin and eventually die. Among the first "alivers" was American Christine Maggiore who formed the organization Alive and Well. Many more have followed.

Make your own research on hiv and aids. It's a very big issue and it takes time and effort to get the picture. But these are good places to start:

www.virusmyth.org contains scientific articles on the issue.
www.aliveandwell.org Christine Maggiores homepage - tells her own story and much more.
www.garynull.com offers videos with overwhelming series of intervies with researchers and others. Some of these videos are also available on Google Video – as are many other videos.


-----------------------

PS: As written on Rense.com June 2 this year, there might be developed a virus in American government labs (Fort Detrick) attacking the human immune system. Actually, it would be strange if there wasn't. But it can have absolutely nothing to do with the "virus" being "tested" in the hiv tests.

Also, a vaccine against a virus whose existence has not been documented and that has not been isolated, is nonsense. The vaccine described in the article on Rense.com may be real but the question is: What virus is it exactly connected to?

Definitely not to the "virus" that is the basis of the multi-billion-dollar aids empire