View Full Version: Royals and nobles believe in Dragon genes?

The Unhived Mind > The Order of Illuminati & New World Order > Royals and nobles believe in Dragon genes?


Title: Royals and nobles believe in Dragon genes?
Description: (good old SMOM once again)


CRAIG-OXLEY - January 22, 2006 12:35 AM (GMT)
Royals and nobles believe in Dragon genes?

http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisati...cle/Dragons.htm


Following are some additional thoughts about the transnational intelligence group Le Cercle and its links with the monarchist Templar organizations. This article doesn't imply that all the thousands and thousands of people involved with these organizations have anything to do with the international intelligence agencies and secret plots.

user posted image
May 2004, Andrew Bertie, head Sovereign Military Order of Malta
worldwide, attends the wedding of the Spanish Crown Prince Felipe.
King Juan Carlos of Spain is both a member of the Order of the Garter
as well as from SMOM. He's also head of the Golden Fleece Order


Le Cercle is clearly managed by people representing the British Throne and some powerful interests in the City of London. Queen Elizabeth II is head of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, an order descended from the Knights Hospitaller (which absorbed the possessions of the Knights Templar in the early 14th century). Another great influence on Le Cercle has been (and possibly still is) the Vatican's Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), also descended from the Knights Hospitaller. SMOM is headed by Andrew Bertie, descendent of Mary Stuart and a cousin of Queen Elizabeth II. One of the founders of Le Cercle was Otto von Habsburg (once heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne) who was the longtime president of the European Council of Princes. This Council of Princes is now being headed by HRH Prince Michael Stewart. In the past, the Council has been funded by the CIA (because of its anti-communist sympathies), an intelligence agency set up and headed by members of the Knights of Malta. On the Stewart's / European Council of Princes' website you can see how the European Council of Princes, The Order of St. John of Jersualem, The Sovereign Military Order of Malta, the Ordo Draconis, Freemasonry, the Knights Hospitaller, and the Knights Templar are all intertwined with each other. A lot of people might have already read about this, but the fact that it's all published on an official website is quite extraordinary.

user posted image
Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St. John of Jerusalem of Rhodes
and of Malta, better known as the Knights of Malta


After reading some of the writings of Nicholas de Vere, I wondered if he carried the same ideas as the Stewarts or the other royal and noble families of Europe. De Vere claims in a lot of detail that an ancient (non-extraterrestrial) Dragon race once interbred with humanity. A relatively small amount of people still carry their genes, which means they have a small difference in their genetic makeup. Of course, some people, like de Vere, have purer Dragon genes than others, which makes them much more wise than all the other ordinary peasants. It also gives them special powers (to communicate with god-knows-what) through the practice of royal witchcraft. In short, they're destined to rule, because common ordinary peasants don't have the ability to develop any of these special powers. But as usual there's a lot of infighting about who's got the most pure genes. And on top of that, de Vere accuses the Catholic church of having replaced the kings of Europe with ordinary humans and to have done everything in its power to destroy his Elven-Fairy-Vampiric-Archdruid-Dragon race.

user posted image
Most Venerable Order of St John of Jerusalem

You might think de Vere is making everything up, but it is true that the extinct Earls of Oxford, who he claims he is a lateral descendant of, were among the bluest of blue blood family lines in England. Those that were introduced into the Knights of the Garter were the 9th Earl of Oxford in 1384, the 11th Earl of Oxford in 1415, the 13th Earl of Oxford in 1486, the 15th Earl of Oxford in 1527, and the 20th and last of the Earls of Oxford in 1660. The 20th Earl of Oxford, Aubrey de Vere, was also the last Earl to be a member of the Privy Council. In these positions they were close advisors to many kings and queens of England and were surrounded by families as Cavendish, Cecil, Spencer, Stuart/Stewart, Arundel, Plantagenet, and others. In many cases these families intermarried.

After reading de Vere used to be head of the British Dragon Court, I wanted to know if this was the same Dragon Court you can find on the website of the Stewarts. I certainly don't believe de Vere, or any other royal for that matter, is more divine than the common man in the street, but I find it very interesting that the nobles of the United Kingdom and the royal families of Europe might actually be interested in Dragon genes and the 'divine right to rule' concept. Can't remember I heard anything about this in my biology classes. From the website of the Ordo Draconis (Sarkany Rend), where Prince Michael Stewart is Grand Master of, we can read something that is very similar to what de Vere is claiming:

user posted image
Dragon Court officers in New York city

"...Shortly after this foundation, Szigmond was crowned Holy Roman Emperor in 1411 and, although the Court's ancient origins were steeped in pre-Christian lore, Pope Gregory XII was obliged to approve his Emperor's establishment, for the nature of the Dragon is such that its princely tradition surmounts the mundane constraints of denominational dispute. After all, King David, Solomon and even Jesus were all pre-Christian dynasts of the line."

So, what this text is saying is that a person with the most pure (Dragon) genes is destined to rule. Religion doesn't matter. If I wouldn't have read this on the official website from the Royal House of Stewart & the Council of Princes I wouldn't have believed it that easily. Below, you can find two email correspondences with Sir John Reid, Secretary to HRH Prince Michael of Albany, and Erin D. Lindsey from the Dragoncourt.org. I asked them a bit about their views on the Knights Templar and the relationship between de Vere and the House of Stewart. You don't get too many answers, but they're still interesting.

Question to the Royal House of Stewart:

QUOTE
Dear Sir / Madam,

I recently came across your website and became a bit confused. For
instance, there seems to have been a debate going on forever if modern
Freemasonry originated from the Templars. Yet, now I see that at the
Templar / Freemasonry section of your website that this notion has been
more or less accepted. Is this true?

And do the Knights of Malta have anything to do with the Knights
Templar? The red crosses look very similar.

Another thing I am very curious about is HRH Prince Nicholas de Vere von
Drakenberg. I read an interview with him in which he claims that his
bloodline, like those of many other nobles, is descended from the
ancient gods, who normally are just considered myths. So, my other
questions are:

What is the opinion of the Council of Princes about Prince Drakenberg?
Do at least some royal families, like the house of Stewart, have the
same ideas as Prince Drakenberg?

I thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Joël van der Reijden


Reply from the Royal House of Stewart (10 days later):

QUOTE
Dear Sir,

Thank you for your e-mail.

To answer your various questions, firstly with regards to Freemasonry
and the Templars, the Catholic dictionary does admit to the fact that
Freemasonry evolved from The Order of the Knights Templar in Scotland.
Prince Michael's next book, to be published next May, deals with that
very subject and lots more.

With regards to the gentleman styling himself Prince Drakenberg, he is
neither a member of the European Council of Princes nor does the
European Council of Princes holds his views as valid. The title is
self-assumed in any case. The only Order of the Dragon (Sarkany Rend)
that is legal is that under the Grand Mastership of HRH Prince Michael
of Albany and legally entered in the Courts of Hungary. Mr de Vere has
nothing to do with the Order.

Yours sincerely,

Sir John Reid
Secretary to HRH Prince Michael of Albany.


So, what Sir John seems to admit is that these people believe that the Knights Templar fled to Scotland (and Portugal) where their philosophies developed into the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Then it's interesting to see when I look at the website of the United Grand Lodge of England I don't see any talk about Templars, only about medieval "stonemasons". HRH the Duke of Kent, cousin of both Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, is head of that lodge.

The bottom part of his email doesn't really go into if de Vere and their Ordo Draconis had a common past or share certain philosophies. That's probably not by accident.

Question to http://www.dragoncourt.org :

QUOTE
Dear sir / madam,

I have a short question. Below, I have pasted two urls:

*http://www.royalhouseofstewart.org.uk/dragon.htm*
Dragon court of which the Stewarts are members

*http://www.thedragonsociety.com*
Nicholas de Vere's Royal Dragon Court.

Do they represent the same society? What I mean is; is Nicholas de Vere head of the society the Stewarts refer to?

sincerely,

Joël van der Reijden

Reply from www.dragoncourt.org:

QUOTE
To answer your question, Nicholas De Vere used to be
allied with Laurence Gardner, Prince Michael Stewart of
Albany, and the Royal Stewart House. But he broke with
them around 2000-2001 when he fell out with Laurence
Gardner, after co-authoring "Bloodline of the Holy
Grail."

Around the same time, De Vere was replaced as head of
the British Dragon Court by Baron Sir Richard Dufton.
In late 2003, Nicholas De Vere or persons claiming to
be operating under his aegis launched the website at
http://www.thedragonsociety.com.

I hope that this information is helpful.

---Erin D. Lindsey


Although the details aren't clear to me, it seems that what de Vere has been writing down is a genuine belief in many noble families and royal families, and known to the leaders of the Vatican. In addition, de Vere and Laurence Gardner have been working together until de Vere accused Gardner of not giving him the proper credentials in the works he wrote. Gardner has been the Presidential Attache of the European Council of Princes. This is the same Council Le Cercle founder Otto von Habsburg has been the long time president of and which today is headed by Prince Michael Stewart.

An interest in bloodlines, without the Dragon theme, is quite common in these aristocratic circles. As has been shown earlier on this site, the leaders of several genealogical organizations have been recruited in the Pilgrims of the United States. Among them are the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne and the Order of the Merovingian Dynasty.

References used

[1] 2000, Nicholas de Vere, 'The Origin of The Dragon Lords of the Rings'
[2] 2002, Nicholas de Vere, 'From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells' (today known as 'The Dragon Legacy')
[3] De Vere interview by Tracy R. Twyman
[4] Website Royal House of Stewart (includes a page on the Dragon Court)

A lot of relevant information is contained within the Bohemian Grove symbolism article

CRAIG-OXLEY - January 22, 2006 12:40 AM (GMT)

QUOTE
And on top of that, de Vere accuses the Catholic church of having replaced the kings of Europe with ordinary humans and to have done everything in its power to destroy his Elven-Fairy-Vampiric-Archdruid-Dragon race.


So what do you get from this little text then? That the Catholic Church which is now headed by the Jesuits rule this god damned world

CRAIG-OXLEY - January 22, 2006 01:02 AM (GMT)
Nicholas de Vere also mentioned Pan in The Origin of The Dragon Lords of the Rings. In fact, he starts out with this deity:

QUOTE
"Hermes is the father of Pan and Zeus is the father of Dionysus. Pan and Dionysus are always featured in the same retinue and as Bacchus, Pan's rites duplicate those of his twin Dionysus... The Dionysic Rites were cannibalistic and vampiric and echo the era of the cannibalism and vampirism of the (Titanic) era of the sons of the Nephilim."

"The wings of Baphomet are swan's wings and this immediately speaks of the swan princes, grail princesses and fairy queens which symbolise the dragon blood. Baphomet is a Nephilim. Its legs are the legs of Pan..."

CRAIG-OXLEY - January 27, 2006 05:30 PM (GMT)
Part 18 - The Dragon Court

http://www.africaforum.com/showthread.php3...72&pagenumber=2

The Imperial and Royal Dragon Court & Order was one of several occult-inspired secret societies created by the aristocracies of Europe following the formation of the Catholic Priory of Sion and the Knights Templar in the 12th Century.

During a time of turmoil within the Holy Roman Empire that controlled most of Europe, these exclusive inner courts and more accessible outer orders were designed to unify the power of the aristocratic families under the Holy Roman Emperor, against an increasingly influential Vatican.

The Dragon Sovereignty, also known as the "Rex Deus" fraternity, was created by Catholic Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund and occultist Vlad the Impaler--the historical figure behind the Dracula myths. Following alchemical principles, the order sought to attain mystical powers that they believed to be their birthright, as inheritors of the bloodline of the Holy Grail.

Vlad the Impaler was a prominent member of the Holy Roman Emperor's court, and while the occult pursuits of the Dragon Court were not unusual amongst similar aristocratic brotherhoods, it is of relevance today as one of the longest surviving and most visible of these secret societies. Recent publications from within the order such as Sir Laurence Gardner's "Genesis of the Grail Kings" outline their detailed beliefs about the evolution of Man, and are bestsellers at bookstore Barnes & Noble. These books describe a belief system similar to that of Madame Blavatsky and her Theosophy movement, which was largely responsible for the esoteric ideas that led to the Jewish Holocaust:

"In practical terms the concept of this unique fraternity can be traced back to the original Grand Assembly of the Annunaki in ancient Mesopotamia".

The aristocratic families of the Dragon Court believe their pure blood makes them the "genetically engineered" and chosen rulers of Man. They believe the natural social order of Humankind is Feudalism rather than Democracy as "Incompetant self-seeking, middle-class idiots more often find themselves voted into control of vast social systems".

Much of the European Community recognizes the Dragon Court as an ethnic racial group and Sovereign State, similar to the secret society the Knights of Malta, who incidently have Permanent Observer status at the United Nations. By its own admission, the order has within its ranks Catholic Bishops, Monsignors, and even a Papal Chaplain - Monsignor Laszlo Esterhazy of the Mariaremete Cathedral in Budapest. Extraordinary claims by ex-Jesuit priest and Vatican insider Malachi Martin may finally get the attention they deserve, albeit after his untimely death in 1999. Martin worked in the inner circles of the Vatican for over twenty years, spoke 17 languages, and wrote many respected scholarly books. However, his final book claimed an occult conspiracy was afoot within the Vatican, and that Satanic rituals were conducted within a Secret Church dedicated to "Lucifer".

The Dragon Court is directly linked to the European Council of Princes - the political body of the European Grail families, who participated in the formation of the New World Order think-tank "The Bilderberg Group". Sir Laurence Gardner is both Chancellor of the Dragon Court and Presidential Attache to the Council of Princes. By their own admission, the Council of Princes was supported by the CIA in their fight against global communism. However, the Princes did not fight communism in order to restore democracy, but in order to reclaim their birthright as natural rulers within a feudal system that caused so much suffering to the Russian people prior to their revolution of 1917.

The Dragon Court primarily concerns itself with Witchcraft and alchemical Vampirism, and considers itself the terrestrial incarnation of the pantheon of the Gods.

It's function is to do "the will of the Gods" as interpreted by the Court's hierarchy. Gardner bluntly elaborates in his book "Genesis of the Grail Kings":

"The Mesopotamian (Sumerian) accounts indicate a rampant population problem which had to be curtailed. An ancient Akkadian text states that the people had multiplied beyond any control and were so noisy that Enlil (Annunaki God) could not get any sleep... they were still lacking the key elements of wisdom and a properly regulated society. There was no marital institution and there were no rules governing procreational couples. Until 4000 BC, sexual mating was largely a matter of free will, with a freedom of partners... they were apparently not conditioned to municipal laws and organized social government. The tablets reveal that Enlil had tried to reduce the population by means of selective famines and plagues, but without success. And so the Assembley of the Annunaki elected for a drastic solution that could quickly pave the way to a new beginning. They agreed to flood the Sumerian region in its entirety".

The genocidal impulse of the Gods doesn't find any difficulty expressing itself in modern times. No doubt the recent spread of AIDS in Africa is also the handiwork of the Assembley of the Annunaki Gods.

Presumably so was the naming of the vast mountain range which covers most of South Africa - the "Drakensberg Mountains".

In a naive attempt to put a human face to the mask that the Dragon Court has worn since its inception, Chancellor Gardner and Sovereign Grand Master Prince Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg reveal much about their Occult philosophy and belief system. Having been appointed Sovereign Grand Master by the House of Habsburg (former head of the European Council of Princes Prince Otto von Habsburg), De Vere von Drakenberg is attempting to make a case with his website "dragoncourt.org", where he openly discussed the values of the Order - namely Vampirism, Witchcraft and Satanism. His e-book "From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells" candidly admits that their forefathers the Knight's Templar were a "deeply Satanic organization".

This would be of little consequence were it not for the fact that the Knights Templar are also the founding fathers of modern Freemasonry, and the role model for the Ivy League secret society "Skull and Bones" of which past President and CIA director George Bush was a member. President George W. Bush admitted in a Time magazine interview (Aug 7, 2000) that he too is an initiate. When asked to elaborate, he responds "Without revealing all the great secrets?", then adds that his father told him "These same secret societies are behind it all".

Earlier in 2000, Yale's "Skull and Bones" secret society featured Sir Laurence Gardner as a guest speaker.

Gardner's historical writings have recently been approved and sanctioned by the British Royal Family's invitation for him to join the House of Windsor's "Society of Antiquaries", the oldest antiquarian society in the world that was constituted by King George III. Or maybe it is Gardner's extensive knowledge of Witchcraft that caught the eye of the "Royal Windsor Coven", as De Vere refers to them in his essays - "During the late 70's and early 80's a series of privately published papers was circulated with material that originated from the Royal Windsor Coven, with damning criticism of so-called initiatory witchcraft, and emphatically asserted that the only genuine valid form of witchcraft was passed down through the blood". No doubt the rise of right-wing Conservativism in the 1980's was matched by an equal rise in Occultism and Witchcraft.

Magister Templi (Master Templar) De Vere's internal wires are clearly crossed as he declares "Evil is good, and good is evil".

His venomous view of Humanity is difficult reading:

"Man is thoroughly stupid and dim-witted... and this condition is genetically inherited. Nurture seems unable to ameliorate what nature has here ordained. Here the idealist might argue that a eugenic solution mediated through genetic engineering could produce a more passive, thoughtful population by weeding out the stupid gene and replacing it".

"Leaders are supposed to be able to function at a faster rate than the followers and thereby anticipate any given direction the system might go in, and plan sensible strategies that the system might adopt for its well-being".

"To any intelligent person, to any true seer, concepts like white or black magic or good or evil are irrational, childish nonsense; both in terms of logic and actual fact".

After proving that Jesus was a "Dragon King of the Grail Bloodlines" and a "descendant of Satan", De Vere pronounces "The Black Mass was the original Christian Mass of Jesus which the later Catholics stole and sanitised for public consumption".

De Vere assures us that "technically the crime of murder doesn't exist", and comes to the defense of "paedophiles and Satanists" claiming the current "FBI and Scotland Yard investigations are undermining the foundation of the Great Western Civilization". The vampiric rituals "MUST be repeated", the internationally recognized Prince demands.

Through his website De Vere von Drakenberg was accepting submissions of blood samples to be DNA tested at a top London facility for purity of stock. If the potential initiate's blood was shown to be of the authentic bloodlines (and no doubt sufficiently connected politically and economically) they too could join the ranks of the elite aristocracy and become a Vampire. De Vere's goal is to reunify the old bloodlines and create a new Master Race, and no doubt reclaim their aristocratic authority. The elimination of the sub-races would have to be the next priority, as their evolutionary belief system dictates.

"If the planet is to survive, then social groups must become smaller, and must be ordered by economic necessity, not by the global tyranny of the so-called Democracy of Consumerism... By re-introducing their old social structures and values, the Dragons hope to establish a naturally ordained system of socio-economic interactions between the Dragon (Aryan) people".

This new community of born-again Aryans is unlikely to be picking De Vere's apple trees, more likely they will be running transnational corporations, sitting on the secretive "Bilderberg Group", or any other high-level political-financial-military body. The aristocrats of Europe are far from impotent, as illustrated by Prince Bernhard of the Netherland's position as chairman of the "Bilderberg Group" from its inception in 1952 to 1976. His daughter Queen Beatrix regularly attends the Bilderberg meetings, as do other prominant Eurocrats.

While De Vere's pursuits may sound bizarre, to outsiders the draconian methods of the Nazis and the demonic nature of the Holocaust sounded equally unbelievable at the time it was occurring. In 1919 Germany's occult "Thule Society" had 1750 members, including industrialists, business men, scientists, aristocrats, military chiefs, judges, and government ministers. Just over a decade later they had funded and created the Nazi Party, with Adolf Hitler as its leader. The sudden rise to power of Austria's "Freedom Party" headed by neo-Nazi Jorge Haider will almost certainly have connections to the Austro-Hungarian "Sarkeny Rend" inner-council of the Dragon Court. For decades Austria's Prince Otto von Habsburg has been seeking a restoration of the monarchy in Austria, and undoubtedly the "Freedom Party" is part of the plan. De Vere clearly puts his money where his mouth is, believing Gardner's earnings from his bestselling book should be "invested in organisations whose works are the practical expression of the messages conveyed in the written word".

Stanley Kubrick felt sufficently motivated to dedicate his final years to exposing the secret occult pursuits of the Power Elite in his movie Eyes Wide Shut. As Sydney Pollack's character explains to Tom Cruise's Dr. Bill "If you knew who these people were, you wouldn't sleep so good at night". The same goes for the seemingly idiosyncratic, yet dangerously influential and ambitious Dragon Court.


Following the publication of Gardner's "illuminating" book, De Vere's no-holds-barred website, and the subsequent dismissal of Gardner, the Dragon Court apparently spiraled into schism. The inner council of Sarkeny Rend has side-stepped out-of-the-closet and proud Satanist Grand Master De Vere by appointing quasi-Catholic "scion" Prince Michael Stewart as Grand Protector of a rival order at a ceremony at York Manor, England, which was strangely attended by representatives for Queen Elizabeth II. This move allowed Gardner to remain in the fold, but has seemingly sent a tremor through the Dragon Sovereignty. Concurrently a legal challenge has been made by Scotland's Cardinal Winning to reverse the British law that bans Catholics from the throne, paving the way for a Stewart restoration. However, De Vere was appointed Grand Master by Austria's House of Habsburg, also prominent and influential Catholics.

The shadowy world of European secret societies is seemingly as complex as the Gore/Bush November 2000 Presidential race - no doubt its correct outcome, unethically decided by the Supreme Court, was of extreme importance to the Power Elite. The Queen of England's pre-election October visit to the Vatican, the first in 20 years, followed by the much protested post-election December meeting between Pope John Paul II and neo-Nazi Austrian leader Jorge Haider (another Habsburg minion) was undoubtedly all part of the Master Plan, or Final Battle, for absolute power in the New World Order... or at the very least to allow the back-room boys to consolidate their interests, stay on top of their respective power pyramids, and maintain their grip on the hearts and minds of Western civilization. And the rest, post-World Trade Center disaster, is fast becoming history... if not Armageddon.

As of late 2002, according to the Dragon Court website Prince Nicholas De Vere is currently suffering from acute paranoid schizophrenia.

De Vere, whose main contribution to the order was alledgedly adapting rituals "to include the first menstural blood of pre-adolescent girls", has been replaced as his cousin, Baron Sir Richard Dufton, due to De Vere's condition and his involvement with "Americans who wish to remain anonymous" with possible links to the "Dragon Order side of the Ku Klux Klan." Schizophrenia aside, De Vere is now running his own transnational order in tandem with the anonymous Americans; which means that there are now three Dragon Courts to choose from, depending on your personal leanings, and of course, that you are of the Dragon blood.

However, with their claims that a "child of pure blood was born in the late 1980's and is being raised by the Jesuits", and that "two children with purer blood are residing in Great Britain", the plot twists are becoming less Shakespearean, and more Hollywood (as in The Omen) by the day.

But don't take our word for it...

http://www.dragoncourt.org


Prince Michael's rival organization

http://www.royalhouseofstewart.org.uk/dragon.htm

Alexandra - January 27, 2006 08:08 PM (GMT)
Nicholas de Vere is my distant cousin (don't know the exact degree) and I think he's full of it.

I do not believe that a) the Merovingian line is descended from Satan himself or b ) the line is descended from Jesus Christ. I've also heard crap that Cain's real father was Satan, but the Bible gives no indication. Anyone that hands you the "but it was in the version found in the Dead Sea Scrolls" is full of it, too. And I sure don't believe David Icke when he swears up and down the line came from Creatures From Outer Space.

Personally, I think that's certain people having delusions of grandeur. If anything we're most likely descended from the tribe of Dan.

CRAIG-OXLEY - January 28, 2006 01:56 AM (GMT)
The latin term for Satan is Lucifer. Lucifer was the planet Tiamet which was worshipped across the world and looked like a second sun. Tiamet was destroyed and this is where the Fallen Angel part comes into play. So you see that no one can be a son of Satan. If we really want to go into this then you will find that Jesus is no different to Satan and its all linked into BAAL and so forth. Both Jesus and Lucifer are representations of the Sun and of course Tiamet. The Asteroid Belt is the left overs of the destruction of Tiamet.

Theres definately something in this Bloodline information on way or another and I'm sure its you whos RH right?

Alexandra - January 28, 2006 04:01 AM (GMT)
Well, right-hand dominant...I can write with my left, I prefer holding the phone to my left ear, I prefer looking out of my left eye in a peekhole or telescope. *shrug* My husband and mother were going back and forth for a while about whether my son is RH or LH...he's showing a preference for the left hand. :P

My husband is RH, my mother is LH--a lot of relatives on my maternal grandmother's side are LH, and my husband's brother is LH. A second cousin was harassed by a teacher for using her left hand.

Besides, I got some information indicating that the European royals are of Trojan descent, and in turn they're descended from Judah's son Zerah. If I had your e-mail address I could forward it to you--it's a .pdf file. I just now printed it out (yep, I found my printer's power cord LOL).

Oh--forgot--There's a passage in the Bible about the scepter not departing from Judah until Christ returns. That's interesting, given this information about today's royals being descended from Judah!

Draconis - February 6, 2006 01:08 AM (GMT)
I don't put too much faith in DeVere, he seems to put psychic phenomenon and influence as exclusive domain to those with dragon genes when it's been proven time and again to be the domain of every living creature on this planet. He's also coming from a place which, to me, seems uninformed despite his knowledge. I tend to think he's trying to put alot of disinformation out there to dishearten people and put them back to sleep instead of awaken them to their own power.

ArchAngel - February 6, 2006 01:20 AM (GMT)
Welcome Draconis!

Did you find your way here from my post at GLP?

I did not dare do it logged in with their rules about promoting other forums, but that one slipped by with a tactful title.

Alexandra - February 6, 2006 01:28 AM (GMT)
I for one don't wish to have psychic powers, I don't care who my ancestors were.

It's great to know who I'm descended from...the downside is most of them were satanists, some were Crusaders....

dlux - February 12, 2006 04:26 PM (GMT)
Dragons, reptiles, I will assume are from the same bloodlines.

Reptilian agenda currently being updated.

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines.php

However this may be of interest - change DNA, change the 'world' just find the correct frequency/vibration before the NWO starts emitting their stuff over all the communication towers.


DNA Can Be Influenced And Reprogrammed By Words And Frequencies

Russian DNA Discoveries
SPIRITUAL SCIENCE: DNA is influenced by words and frequencies
By Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf

http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Spirit...Science/id/4161

http://noosphere.princeton.edu/fristwall2.html
DNA Can Be Influenced And Reprogrammed By Words And Frequencies
Russian DNA Discoveries


The human DNA is a biological Internet and superior in many aspects to
the artificial one.


The latest Russian SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH directly or indirectly
explains phenomena such as clairvoyance, intuition,
spontaneous and remote acts of healing, self healing, affirmation
techniques, unusual light/auras around people (namely spiritual
masters), the minds influence on weather patterns and
much more.

In addition, there is evidence for a whole new type of medicine in
which DNA can be influenced and reprogrammed by words and frequencies
WITHOUT cutting out and replacing single genes.

Only 10% of our DNA is being used for building proteins. It is this
subset of DNA that is of interest to western researchers and is being
examined and categorized.

The other 90% are considered "junk DNA. The Russian researchers,
however, convinced that nature was not dumb, joined linguists and
geneticists in a venture to explore those 90% of "junk DNA".

Their results, findings and conclusions are simply revolutionary!


ACCORDING TO THEM, our DNA is not only responsible for the
construction of our body but also serves as data storage and
communication.

The Russian linguists found that the genetic code,
especially in the apparently useless 90%, follows the same rules as
all our human languages. To this end they compared the rules of syntax
(the way in which words are put together to form phrases and
sentences), semantics (the study of meaning in language forms) and the
basic rules of grammar.

They found that the alkalines of our DNA follow regular grammar and do
have set rules just like our languages.

So human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of
our inherent DNA.

The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and
his colleagues also explored the vibrational behavior of the DNA. [For
the sake of brevity I will give only a summary here. For further
exploration please refer to the appendix at the end of this article.]

The bottom line was:

"Living chromosomes function just like solitonic/holographic computers
using the endogenous DNA laser radiation."


This means that they managed, for example, to modulate certain
frequency patterns onto a laser ray and with it influenced the DNA
frequency and thus the genetic information itself. Since the basic
structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and of language (as explained earlier)
are of the same structure, no DNA decoding is necessary. One can
simply use words and sentences of the human language!

This, too, was experimentally proven! Living DNA substance (in living
tissue, not in vitro) will always react to language-modulated laser
rays and even to radio waves, if the proper frequencies are being
used.

This finally and scientifically explains why affirmations,
autogenous training, hypnosis and the like can have such strong
effects on humans and their bodies.

It is entirely normal and natural for our DNA to react to language.

While western researchers cut single genes from the DNA strands and
insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically worked on devices
that can influence the cellular metabolism through suitable modulated radio
and light frequencies and thus repair genetic defects.

Garjajev's research group succeeded in proving that with this method
chromosomes damaged by x-rays for example can be repaired.

They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and
transmitted it
onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome. So they
successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander
embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns!

This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the
side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and
re-introducing single genes from the DNA. This represents an
unbelievable, world-transforming revolution and sensation!

All this by simply applying vibration and language instead of the
archaic cutting-out procedure!


This experiment points to the immense power of wave genetics, which
obviously has a greater influence on the formation of organisms than the
biochemical processes of alkaline sequences.


ESOTERIC AND SPIRITUAL TEACHERS

Esoteric and spiritual teachers have known for ages that our body is
programmable by language, words and thought. This has now been
scientifically proven and explained. Of course the frequency has to be
correct. And this is why not everybody is equally successful or can do
it with always the same strength.

The individual person must work on the inner processes and maturity in
order to establish a conscious communication with the DNA. The Russian
researchers work on a method
that is not dependent on these factors but will ALWAYS work, provided
one uses the correct frequency.

But the higher developed an individuals consciousness is, the
less need is there for any type of device! One can achieve these results by
oneself, and science will finally stop laughing at such ideas and will
confirm and explain the results.

The Russian scientists also found out that our DNA can cause disturbing
patterns in the vacuum, thus producing magnetized wormholes!

WORMHOLES

Wormholes are the microscopic equivalents of the so-called
Einstein-Rosen bridges in the vicinity of black holes (left by burned-out stars).

These are tunnel connections between entirely different areas in the
universe through which information can be transmitted outside of space
and time.


HYPERCOMMUNICATION

The DNA attracts these bits of information and passes them
on to our consciousness. This process of hypercommunication is most
effective in a state of relaxation. Stress, worries or a hyperactive
intellect prevent successful hypercommunication or the information
will be totally distorted and useless. In nature, hypercommunication
has been successfully applied for millions of years. The organized
flow of life in insect states proves this dramatically.

Modern man knows it only on a much more subtle level as "intuition".
But we, too, can regain full use of it.

An example from Nature: When a queen ant is spatially separated from
her colony, building still continues fervently and according to plan.
If the queen is killed, however, all work in the colony stops. No ant
knows what to do. Apparently the queen sends the "building plans" also
from far away via the group consciousness of her subjects. She can be
as far away as she wants, as long as she is alive. In man
hypercommunication is most often encountered when one suddenly gains
access to information that is outside ones knowledge base.


INTUITION

Such hypercommunication is then experienced as inspiration or
intuition. The Italian composer Giuseppe Tartini for instance dreamt
one night that a devil sat at his bedside playing the violin. The next
morning Tartini was able to note down the piece exactly from memory,
he called it the Devils Trill Sonata.


UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE ACCESSED

For years, a 42-year old male nurse dreamt of a situation in which he
was hooked up to a kind of knowledge CD-ROM. Verifiable knowledge from
all imaginable fields was then transmitted to him that he was able to
recall in the morning. There was such a flood of information that it
seemed a whole encyclopedia was transmitted at night. The majority of
facts were outside his personal knowledge base and reached technical
details about which he knew absolutely nothing.

When hypercommunication occurs, one can observe in the DNA as well as
in the human being special phenomena. The Russian scientists
irradiated DNA samples with laser light. On screen a typical wave
pattern was formed. When they removed the DNA sample, the wave pattern
did not disappear, it remained. Many control experiments showed that
the pattern still came from the removed sample, whose energy field
apparently remained by itself. This effect is now called phantom DNA
effect.

It is surmised that energy from outside of space and time still flows
through the activated wormholes after the DNA was removed. The side
effect encountered most often in hypercommunication also in human
beings are inexplicable electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of the
persons concerned.


Electronic devices like CD players and the like can be irritated and
cease to function for hours. When the electromagnetic field slowly
dissipates, the devices function normally again. Many healers and
psychics know this effect from their work. The better the atmosphere
and the energy, the more frustrating it is that the recording device
stops functioning and recording exactly at that moment. And repeated
switching on and off after the session does not restore function yet,
but next morning all is back to normal. Perhaps this is reassuring to
read for many, as it has nothing to do with them being technically
inept, it means they are good at hypercommunication.

In their book "Vernetzte Intelligenz" (Network Intelligence),
Grazyna Gosar and Franz Bludorf explain these connections precisely
and clearly.


INDIVIDUALITY

The authors also quote sources presuming that in earlier times
humanity had been, just like the animals, very strongly connected to
the group consciousness and acted as a group. To develop and
experience INDIVIDUALITY we humans however had to forget
hypercommunication almost completely.


LEARNING ?

Now that we are fairly stable in our individual consciousness, we can
create a new form of group consciousness, namely one, in which we
attain access to all information via our DNA without being forced or
remotely controlled about what to do with that information. We now
know that just as on the internet our DNA can feed its proper data
into the network, can call up data from the network and can establish
contact with other participants in the network. [ DANGER D T B ]



TELEPATHY OR "REMOTE SENSING"


Remote healing, telepathy or "remote sensing" about the state of
relatives etc. can thus be explained. Some animals know also from afar
when their owners plan to return home. That can be freshly interpreted
and explained via the concepts of group consciousness and
hypercommunication. Any collective consciousness cannot be sensibly
used over any period of time without a distinctive individuality.
Otherwise we would revert to a primitive herd instinct that is easily
manipulated.


Hypercommunication in the new millennium means something quite
different: Researchers think that if humans with full individuality
would regain group consciousness, they would have a god-like power to
create, alter and shape things on Earth! AND humanity is collectively
moving toward such a group consciousness of the new kind. Fifty
percent of todays children will be problem children as
soon as the
go to school. The system lumps everyone together and demands
adjustment. But the individuality of todays children
is so strong
that that they refuse this adjustment and giving up their
idiosyncrasies in the most diverse ways.

At the same time more and more clairvoyant children are born [see the
book "CHINAS INDIGO CHILDREN" by Paul Dong or the chapter about
Indigos in my book "Nutze die taeglichen Wunder"(Make Use of the Daily
Wonders)].
Something in those children is striving more and more
towards the group consciousness of the new kind, and it will no longer
be suppressed!


WEATHER

As a rule WEATHER, for example, is rather difficult
to influence by a single individual. But it may be influenced by a
group consciousness (nothing new to some tribes doing it in their rain
dances).

Weather is strongly influenced by Earth resonance
frequencies, the so-called Schumann frequencies. But those same
frequencies are also produced in our brains, and when many people
synchronize their thinking or individuals (spiritual masters, for
instance) focus their thoughts in a laser-like fashion, then it is
scientifically speaking not at all surprising if they can thus
influence weather.
Researchers in group consciousness have formulated the theory of Type
I civilizations. A humanity that developed a group consciousness of
the new kind would have neither environmental problems nor scarcity of
energy. For if it were to use its mental power as a unified
civilization, it would have control of the energies of its home planet
as a natural consequence. And that includes all natural
catastrophes!!!

A theoretical Type II civilization would even be able
to control all energies of their home galaxy.
In my book "Nutze die taeglichen Wunder" (Make Use of the Daily
Wonders), I have described an example of this:
Whenever a great many people focus their attention or
consciousness on something similar like Christmas time, a football world
championship or the funeral of Lady Diana in England then certain
random number generators in computers start to deliver ordered numbers
instead of the random ones. An ordered group consciousness creates
order in its whole surroundings!!!

http://noosphere.princeton.edu/fristwall2.html=20

When a great number of people get together very closely, potentials of
violence also dissolve. It looks as if here, too, a kind of
humanitarian consciousness of all humanity is created.

At the Love Parade, for example, where every year about one million of
young people congregate, there has never been any brutal riots as they occur
for instance at sports events. The name of the event alone is not seen
as the cause here. The result of an analysis indicated rather that the
number of people was TOO GREAT to allow a tipping over to violence.

To come back to the DNA: It apparently is also an organic
superconductor that can work at normal body temperature. Artificial
superconductors require extremely low temperatures of between 200 and
140 C to function.


ENERGY

As one recently learned, all superconductors are able to store light
and thus information. This is a further explanation of how the DNA can
store information. There is another phenomenon linked to DNA and
wormholes. Normally, these super small wormholes are highly unstable
and are maintained only for the tiniest fractions of a second. Under
certain conditions (read about it in the Fosar/Bludorf book above)
stable wormholes can organize themselves which then form distinctive
vacuum domains in which, for example, gravity can transform into
electricity. Vacuum domains are self-radiant balls of ionized gas that
contain considerable amounts of energy.

U F O's ? thought controlled ?

There are regions in Russia where such radiant balls appear very
often. Following the ensuing confusion the Russians started massive
research programs leading finally to some of the discoveries mentions
above. Many people know vacuum domains as shiny balls in the sky. The
attentive look at them in wonder and ask themselves, what they could
be. I thought once: "Hello up there. If you happen to be a UFO, fly in
a triangle." And suddenly, the light balls moved in a triangle. Or
they shot across the sky like ice hockey pucks. They accelerated from
zero to crazy speeds while sliding gently across the sky.

One is left gawking and I have, as many others, too, thought them to
be UFOs. Friendly ones, apparently, as they flew in triangles just to
please me. Now the Russians found in the regions where vacuum domains
appear often they sometimes fly as balls of light from the ground
upwards into the sky, that these balls can be guided by thought. One
has found out since that vacuum domains emit waves of low frequency as
they are also produced in our brains. And because of this similarity
of waves they are able to react to our thoughts.

To run excitedly into one that is on ground level might not be such a
great idea, because those balls of light can contain immense energies
and are able to mutate our genes. They can, they dont
necessarily have to, one has to say.


AURA ?

For many spiritual teachers also produce such
visible balls or columns of light in deep meditation or during energy
work which trigger decidedly pleasant feelings and do not cause any
harm. Apparently this is also dependent on some inner order and on the
quality and provenance of the vacuum domain.

There are some spiritual teachers (the young Englishman Ananda, for
example) with whom nothing is seen at first, but when one tries to
take a photograph while they sit and speak or meditate in
hypercommunication, one gets only a picture of a white cloud on a
chair. In some Earth healing projects such light effects also appear
on photographs.

Simply put, these phenomena have to do with gravity and anti-gravity
forces that are also exactly described in the book and with ever more
stable wormholes and hyper-communication and thus with energies from
outside our time and space structure. Earlier generations that got in
contact with such hypercommunication experiences and visible vacuum
domains were convinced that an angel had appeared before them.

And we cannot be too sure to what forms of consciousness we can get
access when using hypercommunication. Not having scientific proof for
their actual existence (people having had such experiences do NOT all
suffer from hallucinations) does not mean that there is no
metaphysical background to it. We have simply made another giant step
towards understanding our reality.

Official science also knows of gravity anomalies on Earth (that
contribute to the formation of vacuum domains), but only of ones of
below one percent. But recently gravity anomalies have been found of
between three and four percent. One of these places is Rocca di Papa,
south of Rome (exact location in the book "Vernetzte Intelligenz" plus
several others). Round objects of all kinds, from balls to full buses,
roll uphill. But the stretch in Rocca di Papa is rather short, and
defying logic sceptics still flee to the theory of optical illusion
(which it cannot be due to several features of the location).

All informations are from the book "Vernetzte Intelligenz" von Grazyna
Fosar und Franz Bludorf, ISBN 3930243237, summarized and commented by
Baerbel. The book is unfortunately only available in German so far.
You can reach the authors here:

www.fosar-bludorf.com ]
Transmitted by Vitae Bergman
www.ryze.com/view.php?who=3Dvitaeb ]

References:
1. http://noosphere.princeton.edu/fristwall2.html
2. http://www.fosar-bludorf.com
3. http://www.ryze.com/view.php?who=3Dvitaeb




CRAIG-OXLEY - July 3, 2006 02:00 AM (GMT)
BLOOD VICTORY

Hope for Future of our Race and Civilisation


by Tracy R. Twyman

I first heard of Nicholas de Vere on an internet chat group - typically an environment where people pretend to be something they are not, using their anonymity as an excuse to behave even more boorishly than they do in real life. On this chat group, we had recently been discussing the theories presented in Laurence Gardner’s book Genesis of the Grail Kings. The list was suddenly flooded with emails declaring that Mr. Gardner’s work was not to be trusted because he had once been involved with the unscrupulous “Nicholas de Vere”, or, as one detractor called him, “Tom Weir.”



The gist of the claim was that Mr. de Vere, who said he was a member of the “Grail bloodline” (the subject of the discussion list) had fabricated a royal genealogy, invented a royal magical order called “The Dragon Court”, which he bogusly declared to be ancient, and stood to make lots of money by selling admission to this order, as well as the sales of his book, From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells (now called The Dragon Legacy) - a book which, according to the emails, was utter nonsense and not worth reading.


Being the individualistic type that I am, my natural inclination upon being told not to read something by self-serving know-it-alls is to seek it out immediately. This I did, easily locating Nicholas de Vere’s book, which was, at that time posted for free in its entirety on the Dragon Court website - hardly the act of an unscrupulous con man wishing to make big bucks off of a bogus claim. I printed out the entire thing and sat down on my bed to read, highlighter in hand to mark off anything important. A day and a half later, I had slept little, consumed lots of coffee, and was sitting in front of a manuscript half-covered in pink highlighter.



For the first in my life, I had discovered another person who thought exactly the same way I did about the Grail, and the Grail bloodline. Everything within this book corroborated the theories, speculations, and ideas that we had been writing about in a book of my own, many of them ideas that I had held for a long time, but never been able to prove. Yet here was a man claiming to speak for that very bloodline and ancient tradition which I had been studying, and stating with assuredness what I had been hesitantly proposing.

De Vere painted a picture of the beginnings of the Grail bloodline in an antediluvian civilization, with a super-human, red-haired race of Grail kings that conquered and ruled over the primitive hordes of the ancient world, with tribes on each continent. It provided the royal houses which guided the destiny of all civilized man. They were overseers, “navigators”, directing the affairs of the world with the Solomonic wisdom inherent in their blood. They watched over a perfect caste-ordered society, in which all people worked and lived within their proper station, creating a harmonious, inter-dependent and respectful relationship between the classes. They created all of the traditions, customs and institutions upon which civilization depends, and of which our current traditions, customs and institutions are pathetic bastardizations. In fact, I would assert that the Dragon tradition has proven to be the very definition of “tradition” itself.

As amazing as it was to find these ideas, identical to my own, in de Vere’s unpublished manuscript, what was truly astounding were the more metaphysical aspects of the theory, again chillingly close to my own ideas. To de Vere, it is the blood itself which provides the basis for the “divine right” of Dragons to be the overseers of society, and this is what sets them apart from the rest of humanity, as gods are from mortals. This is the reason why, originally, they refused to mate outside of their race, and the reason why, later, they indulged in blood-drinking rituals in which the sacred Grail DNA could be consumed. But perhaps most amazing of all, de Vere states that Grail blood contains genes specifically programmed for “magic.”

Dragons, and only Dragons, can perform magic, and are therefore the only authentic Witches, according to de Vere For that reason, magic has always been an exclusive, secretive, royal art, and those outside of the bloodline, such these experiments are doomed to failure. We see these failures walking amongst us everyday, and we can smell the mixture of self-pity and patchouli oil a mile away.

This book lays down for the first time the scientific principles behind the effective use of ritual magic, and why some “magicians” are more effective than others. It explains the significance of the “Grail bloodline”, irrespective of modern pseudo-intellectual theories and religious doctrines. It reveals the true import behind age-old tales of Vampires, Elves, Fairies, etc. It gives a reasonable explanation for the otherwise inexplicable course of man’s history, all the way back to the Golden Age of the gods, and man’s fall from the grace of the natural state of affairs. It lays down the principles behind a fair and ordered society; something we once, during the Golden Age, took for granted. It sets the foundation for a true understanding of man’s natural hierarchy, and issues a death warrant for civilization should this fail to occur.

De Vere writes from the perspective of a lone wolf, a man who fears neither death nor life, and lives for the purpose of being. He writes to satisfy his personal impulse towards self-expression; to put the truth as he sees it down on paper - not to convince anyone else. He is a self-contained entity. He needs nothing and no one outside of himself. Yet he represents and defends the worldview of an entire race of men - or, shall I say, “overmen” - with whom he shares a genetic, familial relationship. To him that is the only human relationship that fully counts, that truly deserves the superior man’s time, effort and emotion. All else is the puerile sentimentalism of the degenerate masses.



Beyond his loyalty to his kinfolk, de Vere’s true fidelity lies with the order of the universe, and that transcendental principle which ordinary men know little of but refer to blindly as “God.” De Vere is an iconoclast, an eccentric genius. He has all the qualities of the great writers and thinkers of history. In his philosophy I put him on the same shelf as Julius Evola, or maybe next to Oswald Spengler. His historical perspective places his work amongst classics like Ignatius Donnelly’s Atlantis: The Antediluvian World, or L.A. Waddell’s The Makers of Civilization in Race and History. His encyclopedic knowledge of occult traditions, their true meanings and origins, is superior perhaps to that of A.E. Waite, Manly Hall, or Israel Regardie. In the future, this book will be indispensable to all serious students of the true occult tradition.

“Hekas hekas este bebeloi!” (“Begone, begone, ye profaners!”)

It is safe to say that nothing is sacred in the writings of Nicholas de Vere, except that which is, by nature, sacred, because it pertains to that which is pure spirit. He does not reserve any pity for the sensitivities of pathetic liberalisms, and makes mincemeat of the modern pseudo-religions: The Cult of Children , the Cult of the Goddess, the Cult of the Oppressed, the Cult of Equality, and the Cult of Economy. Likewise ritualistically slaughtered are the supposedly “right wing” and “conservative” cults such as those of Race, Religion, and Nationalism. This book is likely to anger people; namely:

a. Liberals will not like this book because it dares to point out that not all men are created equal, nor are all men necessarily members of the same species. It shows that nature has assigned a caste system to various types of people, and that society works better when those castes are kept intact. People are happier when not forced, expected, or encouraged to live either above or below their natural station in life.

b. Catholics will be upset by what de Vere has to say about their holy institution. They will also not be pleased with De Vere’s lax attitude towards such contentious issues as incest, homosexuality, cannibalism, blood-drinking, and human sacrifice.

c. New Age people will be upset to read, from someone who clearly knows what he’s talking about, that their incense, candles and figurines are nothing more than a drain on their bank account. (This bank account undoubtedly came with a personalized dragon-themed checkbook that says “The Goddess is alive and magic is afoot.”) The reason for this is because the vast majority of these people are physiologically incapable of performing magic, according to de Vere.



d. White supremacists will be upset because, as tempting as it will be for them to connect their cause to the Dragon heritage, they won’t be able to. De Vere describes the kinfolk which these people come from as slave races fit mostly for field labor. He also dismisses out of hand their precious “Fatherland” idea and their pathetic nation-worship.

e. Finally, de Vere assures me that his work will be offensive to those upper-crust Englishmen and “tinker nobility” who still uphold the farce of Victorian values and artistic tastes. Being an American, I am not exposed to “Victorian values” very often, so I cannot comment on this matter any further.

“After a long sleep, the same theories reappear. Without doubt they return richer and with new clothes, but the foundation remains the same, and the new mask which they wear should not mislead the man of knowledge.”
- Le Serpent Rouge

De Vere’s manifesto portrays a rather pessimistic attitude towards the idea of social progress, implying that the Golden Age of Dragon hegemony is forever lost, never to return. This is something with which I do not agree. In fact, I can see de Vere’s book playing the role of the revolutionary harbinger, welcoming back a lost era. The word “revolution” implies revolving, returning in a circular pattern to the original starting point, like the labyrinthine spiral of history which de Vere discusses later in this volume. All of the points in history therefore issue from, and are based upon the unchanging center, that which is “a priori”, like the snake biting its tail which the Dragon Court uses in its insignia. Nature has a way of correcting imbalances, of restoring elements to their rightful place. Yet before that can happen, we must all be reminded of what the natural order actually is.

Pseudo-intellectuals like to annoyingly quote the tired adage, “Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it.” I say that unless we are reminded of the Golden Age of history we will be unwilling, unmoved, and unable to replicate it in our modern era. This book is like a spell calling forth the forces that ruled thousands of years ago, calling them back to once again hold dominion over us.

Within the pages of this volume we, as Dragons (and I consider myself among them), declare our intention to take back what is rightfully ours. If the powers of God and nature are on our side, how can we fail? “Might is right” is a popular motto amongst those who label themselves “Social Darwinists.” While the principle holds true, a more proper way to express it would be to say that “right is might”. That is, if you are acting righteously in accord with what is right for you, attempting to take hold of the power that is rightfully yours, nature will equip you with the might necessary to accomplish that task. Materialism is the lie, brought to the forefront by the mercantile class so loathed by de Vere, which has caused the decay of society to its current level.

People have whole-heartedly swallowed the assertion that “money is power” (outdone only by the equally offensive “time is money.”) Even those who have attempted to rebel against materialism, such as the Hippies of the ‘60s era, or the Communists of the 20th century, have always fallen into the materialist logic trap. They mistakenly believed that the problem of materialist elitism could be cured by redistributing the material wealth of rich people, and preventing the accumulation of wealth, as if wealth itself were the problem, instead of the people who own it. Foolishly they chanted slogans like, “There is no war but class war”, and made statements like, “Every war in history was fought over money”, when in fact almost every war can be traced back to a spiritual origin, a conflict between deeply held beliefs, ideas, and cultural norms.

It may be true that, as a general rule, those with true power use that power to acquire wealth, and that those who are wealthy often use it to empower themselves. But the fact is that the two concepts - money and power - are two entirely different things. Money is a tool. It can be a reward for goods or services provided, a means of acquiring things that are needed, and a way of enabling projects to come to fruition. If it weren’t for the fact that certain people have acquired large sums of money, nothing of any consequence would ever happen - no wars, no monuments, no research and development. But removed from the context in which it is being used, money is meaningless.



It is a purely contingent phenomenon. Power, however, is something transcendental. Unlike money, it is not something that was invented by mankind as a means to an end. It issues directly from God, and from Nature herself. There is such a thing as power for power’s sake; and power, in the civic realm, is based on sovereignty, which comes from the blood. Therefore, true power resides not in a person’s bank account, but in their DNA. There it rests within most of us, potential energy waiting to be converted into kinetic energy through actual use. But most people are too weak of will, too lazy and unimaginative to make use of it. Even many people of the Dragon blood have sunk into this abyss of uselessness.

But the time for rest and relaxation is over now. We are charged with the responsibility of saving civilization, as the only people who are clear-sighted enough and capable of doing so.

This book is part of a literary zeitgeist currently in manifestation that is destined to usher in a new era amongst the intelligentsia of the Western world, something I have termed “the Renaissance of the Arcadian Mystique.” Already much of the groundwork has been laid by the popular Laurence Gardner books Genesis of the Grail Kings and Dragon Realms of the Ring Lords. By his own admission, these were largely based on this volume you are about to read, which was still awaiting publication at the time Gardner was writing his books. But there is much work yet to be done.



The job of writers, artists and philosophers such as de Vere and I is not to bring about the political revolution which looms on the horizon. That is the job of the men of action who belong to our cause, the born leaders of the Dragon blood who have been waiting and planning in the shadows for centuries, patiently plotting and manipulating in anticipation of the opportunity to act. They need no help in that regard. Rather, it is the job of the literary and artistic set to effect the intellectual revolution, which must precede the political revolution. It is our job to clear the path ahead, to prepare the hearts and minds of the populace for what is to come, and to erase all fear, doubt, and resistance.

We need not worry that the ideological climate is so seemingly hostile to the values of blood, spirit, and hierarchy that we promote. The masses have no will of their own, beyond that which is given to them by those who assert themselves as their superiors. We live in a multi-national culture that considers taking on a new ideological system to be equivalent to putting on a T-shirt. They will attach themselves to any idea which is effectively marketed so as to take advantage of their frail psychology.



The occurrences on the 11th of September, 2001 proved that beyond question. Overnight, the American values of libertarian independence, personal freedom, an inherent “right to privacy”, and a healthy mistrust of authority gave way to state-worship, rabid religious moralism, pithy sentimentality, and a general attitude of compliance towards “whatever’s necessary to keep us safe.” All that was necessary to achieve the result was to push the right buttons.



A Blue Light Special in the Marketplace of Ideas


We have been told that our democratic society is a free “marketplace of ideas.” Since democracy is also capitalistic, it only makes sense that the “marketplace of ideas” embodies the same principles as our economy. The laws of supply and demand dictate what ideas are considered valuable, which beliefs are valid, and therefore which truths exist. By right of popularity, even the laws of physics can be accepted, rejected, or altered at will.

But most ideas are cheap, worthless, crap; both the popularly-held ideas and the majority of the rebellious “counter-ideas” presented by the numerous “counter-cultures.” Better that the intellectuals of today all dedicate themselves to promoting and exploring a single priceless, transcendental idea. They can then find the best ways to defeat all competing, inferior ideas, rather than wasting their lives trying to come up with their own original (they dream) bad ideas, or, worse yet, trying to promote a conglomerate of meaningless and contradictory herd ideas which they regard as worthy by right of their popularity.

A book like this is meant to penetrate into the intellectual, educated class of society, sowing the seeds of Draconian ideals, on hopes that they fall on fertile ground, grow, and pollinate the popular culture al la the “trickle down” theory. It is then up to the intellectuals who have been won over to our side to solidify the ideological revolution in the popular mind. All that is truly necessary for this to occur, once the literate set has been fully indoctrinated, is an eye-catching symbol, and a memorable slogan, then the constant repetition of these two in conjunction until no one can remember a time when these ideas had not been accepted and understood. It is not necessary to argue, debate, or defend these ideas, but only to assert them as the absolute truths that they are.



Wishy-washy discussion which considers the merits of opposing views merely invites attack and ridicule. However, truths spoken with authority and confidence have the mesmerizing effect upon the populace for which we are aiming. Once they are willing to accept, even demanding a transition back to the old, true order, and Draconian traditional values, we can remove the tyrannies of democracy and capitalism, putting to bed once and for all this moronic concept of the “marketplace of ideas.” There is but one real idea, and we must hold true to it unswervingly. When we vacillate, when we stop to consider alternative ideas, we lose. We must surpass the intellect of the populace and aim at the soul. Gustave le Bon wrote in The Crowd :

“All founders of religious or political creeds have established them solely because they were successful in inspiring crowds with those fanatical sentiments which have as result that men find their happiness in worship and obedience and are willing to lay down their lives for their idols.”

This is the effect we are going for, and this monumental text put forth by Nicholas de Vere shall go a long way in promoting that cause. Thanks to him and to others like him (although there truly are no others like him), the future of the Dragon blood trembles with the awesomeness of its glorious potential. Our destiny awaits.


CRAIG-OXLEY - July 3, 2006 02:02 AM (GMT)
Monarchy

by Tracy R. Twyman
2003


When the Stewart King James VI of Scotland ascended the throne of England to become King James I of Great Britain, he made a speech that shocked and appalled the nobles sitting in Parliament. They had been waxing increasingly bold over the last few years, attempting to limit the powers of the crown to strengthen their own. What shocked them was that James used his coronation speech to remind them of the ancient, traditional belief that a monarch is chosen by God to be His emissary and representative on Earth, and ought therefore to be responsible to no one but God. In other words, James was asserting what has become known to history as ‘The Divine Right of Kings’, and they didn’t like it one bit.



Quotes from the speech show how inflammatory his words actually were:

"The state of monarchy is the most supreme thing upon earth, for kings are not only God’s lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God’s throne, but even by God himself are called gods... In the Scriptures, kings are called gods, and so their power after a certain relation compared to divine power. Kings are also compared to fathers of families: for a king is truly Parens Patriae, the politique father of his people... Kings are justly called gods, for that they exercise a manner of resemblance of divine power upon earth: for if you will consider the attributes to God, you shall see how they agree in the person of a king."

The nobles were aghast. This fat, bloated pustule telling everyone to worship him as a god! It seemed patently ridiculous. Even more offensive, James finished up his speech by putting Parliament in its place basically telling them that, since he ruled by the grace of God, any act or word spoken in contradiction of him was an act against God himself. James continued:

"I conclude then this point, touching the power of kings with this axiom of divinity: that as to dispute what God may do is blasphemy... so is it sedition in subjects to dispute what a king may do in the height of his power. I would not have you meddle with such ancient rights of mine as I have received from my predecessors... All novelties are dangerous as well in a politic as in a natural body, and therefore I would loathe to be quarreled in my ancient rights and possessions, for that were to judge me unworthy of that which my predecessors had and left me."

Although it was James I that made the concept famous, he certainly did not invent the idea of Divine Right. The concept is, as we shall show, as old as civilization itself.

As harsh and dictatorial as it may seem, such a system actually protected the rights of individual citizens from even larger and more powerful bullies such as the Parliament and the Pope. When power rests ultimately in the hands of a single individual such as a king, beholden to nobody except God, who need not appease anyone for either money or votes, injustices are more likely to be righted after a direct appeal to him. Furthermore, past monarchs who held their claims to power doggedly in the face of increasing opposition from the Catholic Church managed, as long as they held their power, to save their subjects from the forced religious indoctrination and social servitude that comes with a Catholic theocracy. Author Stephen Coston wrote in 1972’s Sources of English Constitutional History that:

"Without the doctrine of the Divine Right, Roman Catholicism would have dominated history well beyond its current employment in the Dark Ages. Furthermore, Divine Right made it possible for the Protestant Reformation in England to take place, mature and spread to the rest of the world."

The Divine Right practiced by European monarchs was actually based on a more ancient doctrine practiced by the monarchs of Judah and Israel in the Old Testament. Many European royal families considered them to be their ancestors, tracing their royal European lineage back to the Jewish King David, sometimes through the descendants of Jesus Christ. Such a line of descent was (and is) known as the "Grail Bloodline."



One of Europe’s most famous monarchs, Charlemagne the Great, was often called "David" in reference to his famous ancestor, and Habsburg King Otto was called "the son of David." In fact, the European tradition of anointing kings comes from that practiced in the Old Testament. Author George Athas describes how the ceremony symbolized the Lord Yahweh adopting the new king as his own son:

"Firstly, the king was the ‘Anointed’ of Yahweh - the mesiach, from which we derive the term ‘Messiah.’ At his anointing (or his coronation), the Spirit of Yahweh entered the king, giving him superhuman qualities and allowing him to carry out the dictates of the deity. The psalmist of Psalm 45 describes the king as ‘fairer than the sons of men’, and continued to praise his majestic characteristics. This king also had eternal life granted to him by Yahweh. The deity is portrayed as saying to him, ‘You are my son - today I have sired you.’ The king was Yahweh’s Firstborn - the bekhor - who was the heir to his father’s estate. He was ‘the highest of the kings of the earth.’ Thus, the king was adopted by Yahweh at his coronation and, as such, was in closer communion with the deity than the rest of the people. On many occasions, Yahweh was called the king’s god.



The king was distinguished far above the ordinary mortal, rendering him holy and his person sacred. It was regarded as a grievous offence to lay a hand on him. Thus, to overthrow the king was rebellion of the most heinous sort and an affront to the deity who had appointed the king... We can note that the King of Judah and Israel is described in divine terms. He is, for example, seen as sitting at Yahweh’s right hand, and his adopted son. We find similar motifs of Pharaohs seated to the right of a deity of Egypt. Psalm 45:7 calls the king an ‘elohim’ - a god. Psalm 45:7also says ‘Your throne is like God’s throne.’"

Here we see the basis for King James’ claim that the scriptures likened human kings to gods. As such, kings were strongly associated with the priesthood as well, and in some cases took on priestly functions. However, traditionally, the Jewish priesthood was dominated by the Cohens of the Tribe of Levi, which was biologically related but functionally separate from the royal line of David - that is, until Jesus came along, heir to both the kingly and priestly titles through his lineage back to both tribes.



However, in other more ancient cultures, such as the Egyptians, the royal and priestly functions were inseparable. In addition to regarding their Pharaohs as the literal offspring of deities, and in fact, deities themselves, the Egyptians believed that the gods had given them the institution of kingship itself. Their first king had been one of their main gods: Osiris, whom all human kings were expected to emulate. Richard Cassaro, in his book, A Deeper Truth, elaborates:

"... during the First Time [The Golden Age when the gods ruled directly on Earth] a human yet eternal king named Osiris initiated a monarchial government in Egypt and imparted a wise law and spiritual wisdom to the people. At the end of his ministry, Osiris left his throne to the people. It was, thereafter, the duty of every king to rule over Egypt in the same manner Osiris had ruled.

This concept that kingship began with a single divine ruler of whom all subsequent human kings are descendants can be traced back to the oldest civilization acknowledged by history, Sumeria, and the other Mesopotamian cultures that followed, such as the Assyrians and the Babylonians. To quote Henri Frankfort:

"In Mesopotamia, the king was regarded as taking on godhood at his coronation, and at every subsequent New Year festival. However, he was often seen as having been predestined to the divine throne by the gods at his birth, or even at the beginning of time. Through a sacred marriage, he had a metaphysical union with the mother goddess, who filled him with life, fertility, and blessing, which he passed onto his people."

The Encyclopedia Britannica has identified three different types of sacred kingship that were recognized in the ancient world. The king was seen as,

(1) the receptacle of supernatural or divine power

(2) the divine or semi-divine ruler

(3) the agent or mediator of the sacred

However, this author believes it is safe to say that all of these concepts stem from the almost universal belief that kingship descended from Heaven with a single divine being who was literally thought of as the ancestor of all those who followed. This king, was known to the ancients as Kronos, the Forgotten Father, and this is another name for the deity/planet, Saturn. He was the ‘brightest star in the heavens", who fell to Earth and intermarried with the wives of men to breed a race of human kings (the Grail Bloodline). After that he was imprisoned in the Underworld by his father, Zeus, the Most High God, for disobeying a social taboo against interbreeding with humans, and sharing secret knowledge with them.



Some might think this contradicts the traditional association of ancient kings with the Sun-God, but in fact, Saturn himself was a sun god of a sort. In ancient times Saturn was the dominant figure in the night sky and as such became known as ‘the midnight sun’ (a term later used by occultists to refer to the Grail). From its position in the sky it appeared to stand still, as the rest of the night sky revolved around it. It was therefore also called ‘The Central Sun.’

Interestingly, although this theory of mine has long been in the works, I’ve recently stumbled across an author named David Talbott who shares this hypothesis on the origin of kingship. From a piece on his website, entitled "Saturn as a Stationary Sun and Universal Monarch’, we read:

"A global tradition recalls an exemplary king ruling in the sky before kings ever ruled on earth.

This mythical figure appears as the first in the line of kings, the father of kings, the model of the good king. But this same figure is commonly remembered as the central luminary of the sky, often a central sun, unmoving sun, or superior sun ruling before the present sun.

And most curiously, with the rise of astronomy this celestial ‘king’ was identified as the planet Saturn."

One can see traces of this ancient progenitor of kings just in the word ‘monarchy’ itself. The syllable "mon" means "one" in Indo-European language systems, as in "The One King Who Rules Over All." But in Egypt, "Mon" was one of the names of the sun god, (also called Amun-Re) in its occluded state, at night, when the sun, as they saw it, passed beneath the Earth. The word meant literally for them, "The Hidden One", because he ruled the world (and the Underworld) from his secret subterranean prison. The syllable "ark" comes from the Greek "arche", meaning "original", or "originator." As the first "monarch", Kronos was the originator of kings, the Forgotten Father of all royal bloodlines. Many of our commonly associated symbols of kingship date back to the time when Kronos first introduced it, and are directly derived from him.



For instance, the crown symbolizes the (central) sun, the "Godhead" descending upon the brow of the wise king. The Sumerian kings adorned their crowns with horns, just like Kronos was believed to have done. The throne was Kronos’ seat on his celestial boat in heaven, and has also been passed down to us. Kronos and his descendants were known as Shepherd Kings, an appellation used by royalty throughout history, and this is the origin of the king’s scepter, which was once a shepherd’s staff. The coronation stone and the orb surmounted by a cross are also Saturnian/solar symbols, and the Egyptian word for the sun, Re, may be the source of the French word for king, Roi.

Kronos, and the god-kings who followed him, were known by the title "Lord of the Four Corners of the World." This has given birth to the universal, recurring archetype of "Le Roi du Monde", a concept that was brilliantly explored in a book by René Guenon of the same name. In a surprising number of cultures throughout the world and throughout history, there exists this concept of "The Lord of the Earth", an omnipresent and eternal monarch who reigns from within the very center of the Earth itself, directing events on the surface with his superhuman psyche. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, "The Lord of the Earth" is a term applied to Satan, or Lucifer, who, like Saturn, was the brightest star in Heaven, but was cast down by God. Like Saturn, he was imprisoned inside the bowels of the Earth, in a realm called Hell.



In fact, it is quite clear that the figure of Satan comes from Saturn, the "Fish-Goat-Man", and obviously the two words are etymologically related. Perhaps this is why the "Grail Bloodline", the divine lineage from which all European kings have come, is traced by many back to Lucifer. The medieval Christian heretics known as the Cathars took this concept to its logical conclusion. They insisted that, since Satan is the ‘King of the World’ ("Rex Mundi’, as they called him), and Jehovah was, in the Bible, the one who created the world, Jehovah and Satan must be one and the same. For preaching this they were massacred unto extinction by the Papacy.

However, in the Eastern tradition, "the Lord of the Earth" represents the ultimate incarnate manifestation of Godhood. They too see him as ruling his kingdom from the center of the Earth, in a subterranean city called either Shamballah or Agartha. And in this tradition, the Lord of the Earth is also a super-spiritual being capable of incarnating on the surface of the Earth in a series of ‘Avatars’, or human kings who rule various eras of existence. According to New Age author Alice Bailey:

"Shamballa is the seat of the ‘Lord of the World’, who has made the sacrifice (analogous to the Bodhisattva’s vow) of remaining to watch over the evolution of men and devas until all have been ‘saved’ or enlightened."

One of the names that the Hindus use for "The Lord of the Earth" is Manu, who, writes Guenon, is,

"a cosmic intelligence that reflects pure spiritual light and formulates the law (Dharma) appropriate to the conditions of our world and our cycle of existence."

Author Ferdinand Ossendowski adds:

"The Lord of the World is in touch with the thoughts of all those who direct the destiny of mankind... He knows their intentions and their ideas. If they are pleasing to God, the Lord of the World favours them with his invisible aid. But if they are displeasing to God, he puts a check on their activities."

These are obviously activities that human kings, as incarnations of the Lord of the Earth, are expected to replicate in their own kingdoms to the best of their ability. In fact, a number of human kings throughout history have been viewed by their subjects as incarnations of the "Lord of the Earth", embodying the concepts that he represents. These include Charlemagne, Alexander the Great (who was believed to have horns literally growing from his head, just like Saturn), and Melchizedek, a mysterious priest-king mentioned repeatedly in the Old Testament and imbued with an inexplicable importance. He was called the "Prince of Salem" (as in Jeru-Salem), and is said to have shared bread and wine with Abraham on Mt. Moriah. Some believe that the cup which they used is the artifact that later became known as the Holy Grail.



Some have also identified him with another king of Jerusalem, Adonizedek, and with Shem, Noah’s son. Nobody knows what his ancestry is, who his descendants might have been, or why, thousands of years later, Jesus Christ was referred to in the scriptures as, "A priest according to the Order of Melchizedek."



Of Melchizedek’s significance, René Guenon writes:

"Melchizedek, or more precisely, Melki-Tsedeq, is none other than the title used by Judeo-Christian tradition to denote the function of ‘The Lord of the World’...

Melki-Tsedeq is thus both king and priest. His name means ‘King of Justice’, and he is also king of Salem, that is, of ‘Peace’, so again we find ‘Justice’ and "Peace’, the fundamental attributes pertaining to the ‘Lord of the World.’"

Even more pertinent information is provided by René Guenon’s good friend Julius Evola, who in his book The Mystery of the Grail wrote:

"In some Syriac texts, mention is made of a stone that is the foundation, or center of the world, hidden in the ‘primordial depths, near God’s temple. It is put in relation with the body of the primordial man (Adam) and, interestingly enough, with an inaccessible mountain place, the access to which must not be revealed to other people; here Melchizedek, ‘in divine and eternal service’, watches over Adam’s body. In Melchizedek we find again the representation of the supreme function of the Universal Ruler, which is simultaneously regal and priestly; here this representation is associated with some kind of guardian of Adam’s body who originally possessed the Grail and who, after losing it, no longer lives. This is found together with the motifs of a mysterious stone and an inaccessible seat."

Clearly, that foundation stone of the world is the same as the Black, or Hidden Sun in the center of the Earth, or the ‘Grail Stone’ which is said to be hidden in that location. The Grail Romances provide us with much insight into the ‘King of the World’ concept. He is represented in the story by one of the supporting characters, Prester John, a king who is mentioned in passing as ruling over a spiritual domain in the faraway East, and who, quite fittingly, is said to come from Davidic descent.



Evola continues:

"The Tractatus pulcherrimus referred to him as ‘king of kings’ rex regnum. He combined spiritual authority with regal power... Yet essentially, ‘Prester John’ is only a title and a name, which designates not a given individual but rather a function. Thus in Wolfram von Eschenbach and in the Titurel we find ‘Prester John’ as a title; the Grail, as we will see, indicates from time to time the person who must become Prester John. Moreover, in the legend, ‘Prester John’ designates one who keeps in check the people of Gog and Magog, who exercises a visible and invisible dominion , figuratively, dominion over both natural and invisible beings, and who defends the access of his kingdom with ‘lions’ and ‘giants.’ In this kingdom is also found the ‘fountain of youth.’"



"The dignity of a sacred king is often accompanied by biblical reminiscences, by presenting Prester John as the son or nephew of King David, and sometimes as King David himself... ‘David, King of the Hindus, who is called by the people ‘Prester John’ - the King (Prester John) descends from the son of King David."

The "Lord of the Earth", or the figures that represent him, are often symbolized by a victory stone, or a foundation stone which is emblematic of their authority. For instance, British kings are crowned on the "Stone of Destiny", believed to have been used as a pillow by Jacob in the Old Testament. Such a stone is often referred to in mythology as having fallen from Heaven, like the Grail Stone, which fell out of Lucifer’s crown during his war with God, and became the foundation stone for the Grail kingdom, having the power, as it is written, to ‘make kings.’ Because it fell from Heaven, the Grail is also often associated with a falling star, like that which Lucifer represents. Of course the Black Sun in the center of the Earth also represents Rex Mundi‘s victory stone. It is interesting, then, that in the Babylonian tongue, the word "tsar" means "rock", and is not only an anagram of "star", but a word that in the Russian language refers to an imperial monarch.



Sometimes the monarchial foundation stone is represented as a mountain, especially the World or Primordial Mountain that in mythology provides the Earth with its central axis. The Sumerians referred to this as Mt. Mashu. Its twin peaks were said to reach up to Heaven, while the tunnels and caves within it reached down to the depths of Hell. Jehovah in the Bible, sometimes called El Shaddai ("The Lord of the Mountain") had Mt. Zion for a foundation stone, and was believed to actually live inside of the mountain. Later, the kingdom of Jesus Christ was said to be "founded upon the Rock of Sion".

The stone that fell from Heaven, the royal victory stone, is also sometimes depicted under the symbolic form of a castrated phallus, such as that of Kronos, whose disembodied penis was hurled into the ocean, and there spawned the Lady Venus. This story is a recapitulation of the Osiris story, as well as the inspiration for the Grail legends, in which the Fisher King is wounded in the genitals, causing the entire kingdom to fall under a spell of perpetual malaise. The only thing that can heal the king, and therefore the kingdom is the Grail. This is a recurring theme in world mythology. The king and/or the kingdom that temporarily falls asleep or falls under a magic spell which renders it/him ineffectual for a time, until the stars are right, or the proper conditions are met. This causes the king and his kingdom to reawaken, to rise from the ashes, from the tomb, or often, to rise out of the sea.



The cycle recurs in the tales of the Lord of the Earth, who alternates between periods of death-like sleep within his tomb in the center of the Earth, and rebirth, in which he once again returns to watch over his kingdom, to restore righteousness and justice to the land. He then presides over a new, revitalized "Golden Age".



Julius Evola writes of the archetype:

"It is a theme that dates back to the most ancient times and that bears a certain relation to the doctrine of the ‘cyclical manifestations’ or avatars, namely, the manifestation, occurring at special times and in various forms, of a single principle, which during intermediate periods exists in an unmanifested state. Thus every time a king displayed the traits of an incarnation of such a principle, the idea arose in the legend that he has not died but has withdrawn into an inaccessible seat whence once day he will manifest, or that he is asleep and will awaken one day... The image of a regality in a state of sleep or apparent death, however, is akin to that of an altered, wounded, paralyzed regality, in regard not to its intangible principle but to its external and historical representatives.



Hence the theme of the wounded, mutilated or weakened king who continues to live in an inaccessible center, in which time and death are suspended.... In the Hindu tradition we encounter the theme of Mahaksyapa, who sleeps in a mountain but will awaken at the sound of shells at the time of the new manifestation of the principle that previously manifested itself in the form of Buddha. Such a period is also that of the coming of a Universal Ruler (cakravartin) by the name of Samkha. Since samkha means ‘shells’, this verbal assimilation expresses the idea of the awakening from sleep of the new manifestation of the King of the World and of the same primordial tradition that the above-mentioned legend conceives to be enclosed (during the intermediate period of crisis) in a shell. When the right time comes, in conformity with the cyclical laws, a new manifestation from above will occur (Kalki-avatara) in the form of a sacred king who will triumph over the Dark Age.

"...many people thought that the Roman world, in its imperial and pagan phase, signified the beginning of a new Golden Age, the king of which, Kronos, was believed to be living in a state of slumber in the Hyperborean region. During Augustus’ reign, the Sibylline prophecies announced the advent of a ‘solar’ king, a rex a coelo, or ex sole missus, to which Horace seems to refer when he invokes the advent of Apollo, the Hyperborean god of the Golden Age. "

Rene Guenon, Evola’s good friend, believed in this concept, and that the periods of slumber for the Lord of the Earth have been cyclically brought to a close by apocalypses. After this, Le Roi du Monde would return to clean up the wreckage and once more look after his faithful flock. In the Revelation of St. John the Divine, three kings actually return from periods of slumber, death, or prolonged absence: Jesus, Satan, and Jehovah, and naturally, the governmental entity that God chooses for this utopian world is the one which has always been associated with holiness and righteousness: monarchy.

Monarchy was the first form of government observed by man, and it was, according to almost every culture, created by God himself. It is the primordial, archetypal form of government, the most natural, that which all other forms of government vainly try to mimic, while at the same time violating its most basic tenets. Monarchy was, for thousands of years, all that man knew. The idea of not having a monarch, a father figure to watch over them, to maintain the community’s relationship with the divine, represented to them, not freedom, but chaos, uncertainty, and within a short time, death. The common people did not jealously vie for positions of power, nor did they desire to have any say in the decision of who would be king. In fact, most of them preferred that there be no decision to make at all: most monarchies functioned on the principle of primogeniture, passing the scepter and crown down from father to son, or in some cases, through the matrilineal line. The decision was up to nature or God, so therefore just and righteous in itself.



Furthermore, they knew they could count on their king or queen to watch over them as they would their own children, to be fair and honest, to protect them from invasion, to maintain the proper relationship between God and the kingdom. They desired to make their kingdom on Earth reflect the order and perfection that existed in God’s kingdom in Heaven.



And for thousands of years before the modern era, when 90% of the population was not intellectually capable of participating in government or making electoral decisions, monarchy stood as a bulwark against the disintegration of the societal unit, providing a stability that otherwise could not be achieved. If monarchy had not been invented, human history could never have happened.



Richard Cassino, in A Deeper Truth, said it best:

"Since the obligation of every king... is to maintain law, order, morality, spirituality, and religion within his kingdom, then the very design of a monarchy itself was probably conceived by the superior intelligence called God so as to endow mankind with a sound system of government. In other words, the concept of kingship was designed for, and delivered to, the peoples of earth by God to teach mankind to live in a humanized social environment... Human history, with its past and present kingdoms and kings - Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Babylon, Sumer, Aztec, Inca, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Great Britain, to name a few - stands as a testimony to the fact that the monarchial form of government has been the basis for almost every civilization."

If monarchy is the most perfect form of government, and if it has been responsible for providing us with at least 6000 years of human history, why now does it seem to be only an ancient pretension? Why is the concept of having a monarchy actually function in government considered to be a quaint but laughable thing of the past? Have we really moved beyond monarchy?

Hardly. If you were to graph the entire 6000 years of known human history and isolate the period in which civilized nations have been without monarchs, it would be merely a blip on the spectrum. In fact, of the civilized Western nations, few do not have a monarch reigning either de jure or de facto (although they continue to elect Presidents from royal European lineage.) Most nations that maintain representational government still have a monarch either recognized by the government, or by the people at large. Although essentially powerless, these monarchs maintain a symbolic link between a nation and its heritage, its most sacred, most ancient traditions.



They also constitute a government-in-waiting, should the thin veneer of illusory ‘freedom’ and ‘equality’ that maintains democracy break down. The modern system of Republican government is based not so much on the freedom of the individual, but on the free flow of money, on debt, usury, and inflation, on a monetary house of cards known as "Fractional Reserve Lending." It would only take a major and slightly prolonged collapse of the monetary system to eliminate this governmental system. At that point, civilized man will have essentially two choices: anarchy or monarchy, and if people have any sense at all they will choose the latter, rather than subjecting themselves to a chaotic succession of despots interspersed with periods of violence and rioting, and the poverty that comes with the lack of a stable state.



It would be the most natural thing in the world for the royal families of Earth, as well as the monarchial system which they have maintained, and which has maintained us for thousands of years, to just slide right into place. The kingdom of the gods, who once ruled during man’s Golden Age, would awaken from their slumber and heed the call to duty, like Kronos, their Forgotten Father, and monarch of all, who soundly sleeps within his tomb in the primordial mountain, waiting for his chance to once again hold dominion over the Earth.


CRAIG-OXLEY - July 3, 2006 02:04 AM (GMT)
The Code of a Revolution

The Background

Many Christians in Europe and North America today feel that the stories in the New Testament should not perhaps be taken as literally as they were a few generations ago. Of course Darwin’s theory of evolution has contributed much towards this. Also, in industrial societies, we do not feel such a need to pray to God for harvests, even though we may appeal to him for good weather for our holidays as a kind of insurance policy. There are, of course, those who take every word in the New Testament literally, and their beliefs have to be respected.

However, we have to bear in mind that Palestine at the time of Jesus Christ was a country in chaos. Three thousand Jewish rebels were crucified under the occupying power of the Romans after they had assumed direct rule of the Jews in 6AD. Pontius Pilate was a cruel and corrupt ruler who compounded the atrocities committed by his predecessors. It is therefore surprising that there were no openly anti-Roman writings in the Bible to relate these circumstances. Not even such incidents as the burning of Rome by Nero were mentioned.

There was a bewildering array of active Jewish sects and sub-sects at the time. Jesus Christ was a Jew, and there is evidence that his sympathies were with the Jewish uprisings organized by such groups. According to The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, Jesus Christ seemed to have connections with most of them. It is difficult to differentiate among the various groups. There were the Pharisees who, despite what is said in the Bible, were anti-Roman, although rather more passively so than other sects. The original Greek version of the Bible refers to Jesus Christ as a Nazarene. This was later wrongly interpreted to mean that he came from Nazareth. It is believed that the town of Nazareth did not exist at the time of Christ’s birth as there is no contemporary mention of it.

The sect, the Nazarines or Nazarites, were certainly in existence at the time of Christ, and Christ’s brother, James, and John the Baptist were both Nazarites. The modern Arabic word Nasrini means Christian, and derives from the Hebrew Nazrim, a plural noun that comes from the term Nazrie-ha-Brit which means ‘Keeper of the Covenant’, a rank of the Essenes Community at Qumran on the Dead Sea. The Nazorites were associated with the Community of the Essenes in the time of the Gospels. The Essenes were an austere mystical sect whose influence at the time is underestimated. The Nazarites were an important sub-sect of the Essenes.

It is highly probable that if Christ did not actually belong to the community known as the Essenes, he was well-versed in their beliefs and sympathized with them. The Essenes believed strongly in the coming of the Messiah, descended from the line of David.

There was also a group called the Zealots. They were not an independent sect, rather a group whose members originated from other sects, and constituted the ‘strong-arm’ of the movement against the Romans. Their activities would today be termed ‘terrorist’ and the uprising of the whole of Judea against the Romans in 66 AD was the result of their activities. Although the Jews were massacred by the Romans after this revolt, the activities of the Zealots continued unabated for another century after Jesus Christ’s death.

Even if Jesus Christ had not been a Zealot himself, he was crucified as one. The two men who were crucified with him certainly were Zealots. Jesus Christ embarrasses the church by being reported as saying that he has come not to "bring peace but a sword". He asks his disciples to purchase swords [Luke 22:36], and checks that they have swords after the Passover meal [Luke 22:38]. According to the fourth Gospel, Simon Peter is carrying a sword when Jesus is arrested. In the context of the day, these are surely the descriptions of a leader who is prepared for and willing to take part in violence. Certainly Christ was executed by the Romans in the way that they reserved for revolutionaries.

Jesus Christ had no intention of forming a new religion. The idea that the Messiah was regarded as divine would have been preposterous to the Jews. The Greek word for Messiah is ‘Christ’ or ‘Christos’, and means anointed one, or king. When David became king, he was also a ‘Messiah’ or ‘Christ’. When Jesus was born, he was also seen as being the Messiah because of his Davidic pedigree. The Jews felt that this new-born king would be the one who would deliver them from the Romans.

It is evident that the stories in the New Testament are told in an allegorical way; in a code that would be understood by some of the Jews and not by their Roman rulers. Words that are used seem strangely unrelated to their actual meanings, until, perhaps, we consider how certain terms have come into the English language. We can say, for example, "He used to be on the board, but now he is in the Cabinet." This, of course, does not mean, "He used to be on a piece of wood, but now he is in the cupboard."

These words and phrases (in Hebrew pershar in the singular, persharim in the plural) had the same meaning each time they were used. Additionally each time the meaning was required, the persharim were used.

Before looking at some of the more familiar stories from the Bible, here are some of the words used in the New Testament and the explanation of what they really mean. The following explanations are taken from the Persharim, the Manual of Discipline, the Community Rule and the Angelic Liturgy as quoted in The Bloodline of the Holy Grail.

for those with ears to hear
this was the signal that a statement that there would follow a message that could be interpreted by those who knew the code

Babylon
Rome

the word of God, the word
Jesus Christ

the lion
the Roman Emperor

the poor
those who had been initiated into the higher ranks of the Community and had therefore had to give up their worldly wealth

the many
the head of the celibate Community

the crowd
a designation of the regional Tetrarch (governor)

the multitude
the governing council

the children
the novices within the community

the Way
the doctrine of the Community

the Children of Light
those who followed the doctrines of "the Way"

leper
a person who has not yet been initiated into the higher Community

the blind
those who did not follow the doctrine of "the Way"

the Power, the Kingdom, the Glory
the Priest, King and Prophet of the Community

The Loaves and the Fishes

The story of the loaves and fishes is an example of a parable. As an example of how the coding was used to inform "those with ears to hear" let’s look at one of the more familiar stories from the Bible, and see how the code was used.

Gentiles who wanted to be baptized in the Judaic tradition were referred to as "fishes". They were hauled out of the water into boats by "fishermen" to be blessed by the "fishers" who were the priests. Similarly, the Levite officials of the Sanctuary were known as "loaves". In the ordination rite, the Levite priests would serve seven loaves of bread to the priests and five loaves and two fishes to the celibates. The Gentiles were allowed to receive baptism only as "fishes" whereas only Jews could become "loaves".

At these ceremonies the "fishermen" would take their boats out into the water, and the Gentile fishes, who were to be baptized, would walk out into the water. When this had taken place, the priest "fishers" would walk out into the water along jetties, and thus "walking on water" to the boats. As Jesus had been born into the house of Judah, and was therefore not a Levite, he was not entitled to act as a baptismal priest, but he chose to disregard this convention, and "walked on the sea" to the disciples’ boats.

One of the main aims of Jesus Christ’s philosophy was to bring the "unclean" Gentiles together with the Jews, and furthermore to let them take part in what had been reserved for the Jewish priesthood. There was a group of uncircumcised Gentiles known as the "Five Thousand", and Jesus granted the "multitude" (in other words, their governing body) the serving of five loaves and two fishes that were otherwise the reserve of the Jewish priesthood candidates.

None of this detracts from any skills Jesus Christ may have had as a healer. However, it was not a healer that was predicted to arrive as the Messiah. What differentiated Jesus from the others was that, despite the feelings of such groups as the Pharisees, he extended his medical expertise to the "unworthy" and "unclean" Gentiles, thus illustrating his ideal of a united people against the authority of the Romans.


Bibliography

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln

The Messianic Legacy by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln

The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh

The Bloodline of the Holy Grail by Lawrence Gardner


CRAIG-OXLEY - July 3, 2006 02:05 AM (GMT)
The Greatest Fraud

by Nicholas de Vere
2003


The Donation of Constantine first appeared during the 8th century and was a document which purported to recognize the Roman popes as Christ’s representatives on Earth and to donate to Pope Sylvester and the Roman Church all those Imperial powers formerly invested in the Throne of Byzantium.

The ’Donation’, the Church claimed, was written in the 4th century at the insistence of the emperor Constantine. The Church said that he was so grateful for having been cured of leprosy by Pope Sylvester, that he gave into the Church’s hand the entire power and wealth of the unified Roman Empire, including the right to crown and dethrone kings. Now that is what you call expensive medical insurance.

Supposedly written before 337 AD - the year of Constantine’s death - the Donation of Constantine actually didn’t make an appearance on the stage of European history until four hundred years later. So far-reaching are the powers bestowed upon the Church by this document, one would have thought that it would have been made public at the time of its bestowal. Not centuries later.

The provisions of the Donation were enforced in 751 AD following which the Merovingians were deposed by the Church and replaced by their sycophants, the Mayors of the Palace who later became known as the Carolingians. The Church had made a pact with the Mayors and offered to ’recognize’ their legitimacy as rulers if they would dispense with the true Dragon Kings. The deal was done and the Carolingians were made the puppet rulers under the Roman Church.

The Donation, because it was made by a Dragon King, Constantine, legitimized the Church’s right to take this action. To all intents and purposes they had the authority of Dragon Kingship given up to them by this Charter. No doubt the Merovingians knew this to be a fraud, which is why they refused to recognize the authority of the Church to meddle in affairs of state. What do we learn from this?

We can see from the Church’s choice of ’benefactor’ that the Church was well aware that universally, only those of the Dragon Blood would be recognized as true kings. Therefore they chose Constantine as he was known to have been descended from both the Britannic PenDragon House and the Dragon House of David. Furthermore he was a member of the Desposyni - the heirs of the Lord - the blood descendants and legitimate representatives of Jesus Christ. In the Donation, it appeared as if Constantine had relinquished his hereditary spiritual position as a Messiah and invested it in the Papacy.

By suggesting they were the representatives of Christ, the popes were claiming Dragon descent for themselves. It was well known that Jesus had descendants and that they were part of the only Eurasian dynasty which was authorized to be kings - the Elven Overlords or Dragons. It would have appeared to the public then, that in the displacement of the Merovingians, one Dragon dynasty was being replaced by another, albeit a paper one. This reduced any danger of mass unrest. As time passed however, it became uncomfortably clear that the function of kingship under the Merovingians had been entirely different to that under the Carolingians. Whilst the Merovingians had formerly assumed the role of overseers, sages and wise counsellors, the Carolingians and their successors, prompted by the Church, became deliberately poorly educated, ignorant, insensitive tyrants and territorial tradesmen.

Dragon Kingship and the Grail Code had died to be replaced by a corrupted form of feudal totalitarianism and brutal, economic slavery as the Church carefully and strategically replaced the old dynasties with its own merchant-class client families who, from that day on, became vassals of the Vatican.

Lastly we learn that from 751 AD the true Dark Age began in earnest. The Elven Holocaust was initiated and would run its course for another thousand years until, in England at least, the witchcraft laws were repealed in 1736. North of the border in Scotland, however, the persecution of witches in the 1700’s was at its fiercest until the end of the century.

During this time, history has witnessed the rise of the Church of Rome and its successful struggle for power. In time, no dynasty ruled in Europe or remained in power unless the Church sanctioned their reign. The Church chose the royal families, it crowned kings and it deposed its detractors. In short, the Church, under the auspices of the Donation of Constantine was the sole and supreme temporal power in Europe and the known world. Without this purported imperial benefice however, the Church would have remained a marginalized Mediterranean cult contesting for patronage along with a host of other gnostic Christian denominations.

The royal dynasties, sponsored by the Church and crowned by its Divine Right, instituted their courts and parliaments, passed laws and employed agents to act on their behalf. To all intents and purposes it seemed as if the Church had the absolute right of Dragons and wielded power by the very sanction of Jesus Christ and God.

No monarch reigning today and no government under the monarch or instituted in their name would enjoy their position if the Church, empowered by the Donation, had not given them permission to rule in the first place. Without the Donation of Constantine, European history today would be totally different and none of the dynasties past or present would have had the right to have reigned. Nor would they reign now and none of their governments or agencies would have exercised power.

One slight problem, though. The Donation of Constantine is a complete and utter fraud and the Church was never given any temporal powers at all, let alone the right to found dynasties, crown kings or institute governments. The whole document was a lie from beginning to end and has been known to be a fake since Lorenzo Valla applied the methods of historical criticism to it during the Renaissance.

How do we know Valla was correct? The New Testament references incorporated into the wording of the Donation were taken from the Latin Vulgate version of the Bible. The Vulgate Bible was compiled by St. Jerome who was born more than two decades after Constantine was supposed to have signed the Donation. The actual Vulgate Bible wording that appears in the Donation didn’t exist until St Jerome invented it, fifty years after the document had supposedly been dated and signed by the Emperor. By this time Constantine had been dead for decades and couldn’t have signed the Dragons’ rights away anyway.

The language of the Donation is eighth century clerical or dog Latin, whilst the Latin used in the 4th century Empire was late classical Roman. The Imperial and Papal ceremonials described in the Donation didn’t exist in Constantine’s time but were developed some centuries later.

Several documentary instances of the Church’s use of the Donation to assert their authority in the medieval period still exist, including the letter of Pope Gregory IX entitled ’Si Memoriam Beneficiorum’ dated October 23rd 1236 and addressed to the Emperor Frederick II. Pope Gregory writes,

".......that as the Vicar of the Prince of Apostles (the Roman Pope) governed the empire of priesthood and of souls in the whole world, so he should also reign over things and bodies throughout the whole world; and considering that, he should rule over earthly matters by the reins of justice to whom - as it is known - God had committed on earth the charge over spiritual things. The Emperor Constantine humbled himself by his own vow and handed over the empire to the perpetual care of the Roman Pontiff with the Imperial Insignia and sceptres and the City and Duchy of Rome........".

People in the medieval and Renaissance period, confronted with this document, did not generally criticize the Donation on the grounds of its veracity. They just exclaimed aghast that they could not believe that Constantine would have been stupid enough to have given the Roman Church everything.

From the Donation we understand that Constantine offered the Pope all the robes and Crowns of office but the Pope, being such a humble man, gave them back to the Emperor. This lets the Church off the hook should some malcontent turn up and ask for sartorial evidence. If the readers read the Donation for themselves they will be appalled at the pretentious egotism, the arrogance and the sheer material greed of the Church, as authors of the document.

The fraudulent imperial power of the Vatican to create kings by ’coronation’ - derived from this faked 8th century ’Donation of Constantine’ - was later adopted by the Archbishops of the Church of England with the complicity of the Tudors, who were Catholics themselves.

When he split with Rome, Henry VIII still retained and later ratified and re-established in the Anglo-Catholic Church of England the fraudulent right of the Church’s clergy to create by coronation, a succession of British monarchs. This was an illegal act. The ’Donation of Constantine’ was proved to be a completely fake document. Therefore no Royal Elven House that knew its origins and cared about social justice could possibly bring itself to recognize a Christian British monarchy or any of their Church sponsored, Church crowned predecessors or any of their regnant or formerly regnant, European cousin Houses.

Because the Donation was a fraud and no subsequent priest of any Catholic derived denomination ever had the right to crown kings, Britain has had no legally reigning monarch for 900 years. As a consequence of this, all the laws passed by these monarchs were and are illegal and worthless and all the governmental agencies set up by or derived from these monarchs or their laws are also illegal and worthless up to the present day.

When considering this, the reader might like to consider the fact that all the arrests ever made by the police in Britain and Europe are acts of kidnap and habeas corpus. Equally, any man who has taken up arms for the Crown and killed for his country is unprotected by law and guilty therefore of murder.

However, paradoxically, as the entire British legal system is illegal, there are no laws, and so the crimes of habeas corpus and murder as we define them today, simply do not exist. Subconsciously people know that their politicians and monarchs have no legitimate authority to rule over them. They manifest this knowledge in an increasing disrespect for these optional, arbitrary and illusory social conventions, which is yet another reason why social order is breaking down.

If the UN is right, we may face chaos in the near future; and all because of a stupid fraud, perpetrated by a group of myopically greedy, maniacal peddlers of false religion who are now long dead.

Again, for asserting this kind of view the Fairies are implicitly guilty of Treason, even though all British laws are constitutionally illegal and the act of treason itself is a non sequitur. Think of the implications of this.

It applies to any nation state in the Christian world today which is still a monarchy or which has evolved as part of a successive, developing political process originating from a monarchy, by virtue of its continuing sanction from, or sponsorship by, the Church of whatever denomination. It is unauthorized by any temporal or divine power to coerce anyone to obey any law originating at any stage of that government’s evolution.

In effect, Britain, Europe and America are ruled by the sword, and that sword is being wielded by people who are no more than short sighted, self seeking robber barons. They have no constitutional right to rule even in America, where in the 19th century, the libertarian commentator, Lysander Spooner, demonstrated that the consensual nature of the original document, upon which the subsequent, consecutive clauses are founded, was being flouted, thereby making the entire Constitution illegal. Pierre Proud’hon called them all "Tyrants and Usurpers". Next time you are tempted to eulogize Western Democracy, bite your tongue and let your brain select first gear before you open your mouth. Flawed or otherwise, the idea that the English speaking world has any democracy at all is a joke.

At the beginning of this work the author stated that the people have been conned enough. He now hopes that the readers might appreciate for themselves the precise extent to which the people have actually been deceived. They have accepted a state of affairs where they and their ancestors have been enslaved by a chameleon-like corporate body that has destroyed their creativity and robbed them of their psychological liberty and their freedom of conscience for over a thousand years.

The entire moral basis of our society is founded upon a massive historical lie which has twisted the minds of generations of individuals until they have become terrified of the natural drives of their own bodies and souls.

The resultant taboos that have been created have been used to divide the minds of the people and make them dependant on the Church-State for solutions to the problems of resisting Satan and fighting temptation and sin, when these contrived, nonsensical whimsies never existed in the first place.

As a result, western Christian society was turned into an open air lunatic asylum packed full of lost souls who weren’t lost at all and had no need of a cure for diseases of the soul they weren’t actually suffering from in the first place.

The Church created the confusion and the division and then offered the solution. In fear the population invested its trust in the perfidious Church and in return for their confidence the Church turned the people into slaves and an entire civilization into a manufacturing plant to service their own greed for luxury and power.

For a thousand years the Fairies have remained silent about their identities - formerly for fear of their lives - latterly for fear of becoming social outcasts and objects of mirth and derision. Still however, a shadow of menace lies over the ancient families. Greed will go to any length to ensure the continuity of its satisfaction and the same motives that prompted the Church to murder and lie in the past, still prompt their merchant-class puppets to kill and deceive today.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree