Title: Becoming Like 606!
theultimate - September 1, 2006 05:28 PM (GMT)
dear mods,
this site is slowly becoming more and more like the 606 of the past few months.
seeing as there are no wums on this board, please could you stop the 30 second rule (although it doesnt really affect me much)
also please all the smilies such as w@nkers :daffodil: to be allowed, there is no need to ban it
i think the swearing letter change is good, changing f-u-c-k to feck.
also, please take some notice of the old 606 and put a my discussion hyperlink at the top of the screen so there is no need to keep clicking my assistant
theultimate
ps: how do you put a picture up on a message- i cant find out how
Injury Time - September 1, 2006 05:36 PM (GMT)
the image needs to be hosted say on www.imageshack.us this will give you a link, copy the link, then when posting a message click on IMG and then paste the link to your image in the box and press return et voila
ABC - September 1, 2006 06:34 PM (GMT)
I doubt it is becoming like 606, although some people have become a bit touchy recently. During the countdown to midnight thread, I posted that the deal would probably be completed tomorrow, so I left at midnight, and some touchy person berates me, and accuses me of being the type of fan who leaves ten minutes before the end of a game that is 1-1. :lol:
I did think his reaction was a bit OTT.
ArsenalsWildChild - September 1, 2006 06:40 PM (GMT)
Someone told be this before but I have forgotton. Whats a WUM!? I have never been a member of 606 ever, only heard that a lot of fights and slanging matches broke out, I have to say I don't find that the case here on GW.
Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? I don't think thats offencive as much as saying the word.
Cripps - September 1, 2006 06:47 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) |
Someone told be this before but I have forgotton. Whats a WUM!? I have never been a member of 606 ever, only heard that a lot of fights and slanging matches broke out, I have to say I don't find that the case here on GW.
Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? I don't think thats offencive as much as saying the word. |
WUM is MUM spelt wrong. ;)
Wind Up Merchant
Grumpy Old Gooner - September 1, 2006 06:49 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) |
| Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? |
Are you about to post a reply to Cripps then? ;)
ArsenalsWildChild - September 1, 2006 06:51 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Wonko the Sane @ Sep 1 2006, 06:49 PM) |
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) | | Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? |
Are you about to post a reply to Cripps then? ;)
|
How did you guess? :lol:
(kidding)
Thanks for telling me again Cripps!
Flava Flav - September 1, 2006 07:09 PM (GMT)
well the other 1600 members seem to think its fine and i am sorry but we have to go with the majority.
The 60 second rule is to stop spamming, the word filter is to stop foul and abusinve language, there are threads in hetre on how to put pics anywhere you so choose
thanks
McNamara That Ghost... - September 1, 2006 07:34 PM (GMT)
It's 30 seconds, isn't it? Not 60.
Then again...we wouldn't know.
;)
Where's My Username Gone? - September 1, 2006 08:58 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) |
Someone told be this before but I have forgotton. Whats a WUM!? I have never been a member of 606 ever, only heard that a lot of fights and slanging matches broke out, I have to say I don't find that the case here on GW.
Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? I don't think thats offencive as much as saying the word. |
How'd you find out about this site? I got it off an advert on Six-slow-Six...
Injury Time - September 1, 2006 10:34 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Chuck D @ Sep 1 2006, 08:09 PM) |
well the other 1600 members seem to think its fine and i am sorry but we have to go with the majority.
The 60 second rule is to stop spamming, the word filter is to stop foul and abusinve language, there are threads in hetre on how to put pics anywhere you so choose
thanks |
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggh my point was you can see the wonker gif on the clickable smilies yet we are not allowed to use it so please remove the wonker gif from said list otherwise you must be offending people who just want to use a smilie :huh:
Cripps - September 1, 2006 10:40 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Wonko the Sane @ Sep 1 2006, 07:49 PM) |
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) | | Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? |
Are you about to post a reply to Cripps then? ;)
|
<_<
ArsenalsWildChild - September 1, 2006 11:17 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (where's my username gone? @ Sep 1 2006, 08:58 PM) |
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) | Someone told be this before but I have forgotton. Whats a WUM!? I have never been a member of 606 ever, only heard that a lot of fights and slanging matches broke out, I have to say I don't find that the case here on GW.
Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? I don't think thats offencive as much as saying the word. |
How'd you find out about this site? I got it off an advert on Six-slow-Six...
|
My mate Lukesagooner knows Joel and he told me about this forum.
Adebayorkies For Life... - September 1, 2006 11:20 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) |
| I have never been a member of 606 ever, only heard that a lot of fights and slanging matches broke out, I have to say I don't find that the case here on GW. |
Aww, that was half the fun of the old 606. You missed out there Debs! :lol:
Oh, I remember a couple of days after we pipped the Spuds and they suddenly stopped appearing on our board. I went over there and saw this girl moaning about how they had been bombarded with Gooner WUMs over the last couple of days. Oh how much fun it was setting the record straight. :haha:
Where's My Username Gone? - September 2, 2006 09:34 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 2 2006, 12:17 AM) |
| QUOTE (where's my username gone? @ Sep 1 2006, 08:58 PM) | | QUOTE (ArsenalsWildChild @ Sep 1 2006, 07:40 PM) | Someone told be this before but I have forgotton. Whats a WUM!? I have never been a member of 606 ever, only heard that a lot of fights and slanging matches broke out, I have to say I don't find that the case here on GW.
Oh yeah ... can we have that W@nker icon back? I don't think thats offencive as much as saying the word. |
How'd you find out about this site? I got it off an advert on Six-slow-Six...
|
My mate Lukesagooner knows Joel and he told me about this forum.
|
Oh.
And please, when you put yourself in your avatar, don't stare sideways at the webcam because it makes your photo look at me wherever I am :unsure:
gilberto silver - September 15, 2006 07:11 PM (GMT)
the flood control is to stop wums
this is a forum so flood control is good
however i would not like it if flood control goes up to 3minutes like 606!
Crushing Bore - September 17, 2006 12:42 AM (GMT)
No swearing or wnkers? Looks like were becoming more like AHFC to me. Does anyone fancy a cup of tea? How many sugars vicar? :ph43r:
Flava Flav - September 17, 2006 06:39 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Bad Badger @ Sep 17 2006, 01:42 AM) |
| No swearing or wnkers? Looks like were becoming more like AHFC to me. Does anyone fancy a cup of tea? How many sugars vicar? :ph43r: |
swear alll you want BB the word filter will just edit out some of the stronger words and replace them with a comedy alternative.......
Grumpy Old Gooner - September 17, 2006 07:07 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flava Flav @ Sep 17 2006, 07:39 AM) |
| QUOTE (Bad Badger @ Sep 17 2006, 01:42 AM) | | No swearing or wnkers? Looks like were becoming more like AHFC to me. Does anyone fancy a cup of tea? How many sugars vicar? :ph43r: |
swear alll you want BB the word filter will just edit out some of the stronger words and replace them with a comedy alternative.......
|
So that's comedy? :blink:
BTW. You said "well the other 1600 members seem to think its fine and i am sorry but we have to go with the majority" earlier in the thread. This is bullshit. You did not ask about putting on the filters in the first place - I don't recall any kind of vote on this.
You used a sledgehammer approach which is the way of 606. There is nothing wrong with occasional use of any words - it depends on context. If someone is being excessive, deal with them individually and stop doing the PE teacher approach and hitting everyone.
I think your general approach is often heavy handed and you should back off a bit.
Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) - September 17, 2006 08:09 AM (GMT)
I think the swear filter had gone a bit far so we removed a lot of the items from it. The worst language is still filtered but I think that's OK.
We have some younger members here, excessive swearing isn't allowed on Invision boards anyway and I honestly don't think it's too much to expect people to be able to express themselves without f'ing and blinding all the time.
Where's My Username Gone? - September 17, 2006 09:01 AM (GMT)
Yeah, f|_|ck was replaced with feck,
f|_|cking was replaced with frelling,
W@nker was replaced with daffodil,
That's all I know.
Flava Flav - September 17, 2006 06:36 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 17 2006, 08:07 AM) |
| QUOTE (Flava Flav @ Sep 17 2006, 07:39 AM) | | QUOTE (Bad Badger @ Sep 17 2006, 01:42 AM) | | No swearing or wnkers? Looks like were becoming more like AHFC to me. Does anyone fancy a cup of tea? How many sugars vicar? :ph43r: |
swear alll you want BB the word filter will just edit out some of the stronger words and replace them with a comedy alternative.......
|
So that's comedy? :blink:
BTW. You said "well the other 1600 members seem to think its fine and i am sorry but we have to go with the majority" earlier in the thread. This is bullshit. You did not ask about putting on the filters in the first place - I don't recall any kind of vote on this.
You used a sledgehammer approach which is the way of 606. There is nothing wrong with occasional use of any words - it depends on context. If someone is being excessive, deal with them individually and stop doing the PE teacher approach and hitting everyone.
I think your general approach is often heavy handed and you should back off a bit.
|
Fair play, we changed it 98% of poepl either said nothing or said it was a good idea...............a few thought it wasnt. We made the decision and it was done. Why would we vote? This isnt a democracy you know............ ;)
Injury Time - September 18, 2006 04:31 PM (GMT)
no mods on for hours on end...just like 606 :blink:
Grumpy Old Gooner - September 18, 2006 04:38 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Injury_Time @ Sep 18 2006, 05:31 PM) |
| no mods on for hours on end...just like 606 :blink: |
... then 3 come on at once.
Injury Time - September 18, 2006 04:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 18 2006, 05:38 PM) |
| QUOTE (Injury_Time @ Sep 18 2006, 05:31 PM) | | no mods on for hours on end...just like 606 :blink: |
... then 3 come on at once.
|
synchronised periods :unsure: well it would explain alot
better get the supplies ready to weather the storm..
The Wright Way - September 19, 2006 05:18 AM (GMT)
does the swearing thing really matter? Even with the word filter, you still manage to get whatever you wanted to say across.
Grumpy Old Gooner - September 19, 2006 09:02 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (gunnerforlife @ Sep 19 2006, 06:18 AM) |
| does the swearing thing really matter? Even with the word filter, you still manage to get whatever you wanted to say across. |
I think we should be able to call a frelling daffodil a frelling daffodil and a wibbling turnip a wibbling turnip. Wangle their mooli's and trash their courgettes, thats what I say.
Injury Time - September 19, 2006 09:06 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 19 2006, 10:02 AM) |
| QUOTE (gunnerforlife @ Sep 19 2006, 06:18 AM) | | does the swearing thing really matter? Even with the word filter, you still manage to get whatever you wanted to say across. |
I think we should be able to call a frelling daffodil a frelling daffodil and a wibbling turnip a wibbling turnip. Wangle their mooli's and trash their courgettes, thats what I say.
|
exactly :blink:
Flava Flav - September 19, 2006 09:27 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 19 2006, 10:02 AM) |
| QUOTE (gunnerforlife @ Sep 19 2006, 06:18 AM) | | does the swearing thing really matter? Even with the word filter, you still manage to get whatever you wanted to say across. |
I think we should be able to call a frelling daffodil a frelling daffodil and a wibbling turnip a wibbling turnip. Wangle their mooli's and trash their courgettes, thats what I say.
|
OK Coney, I will bring the wilf Thread back out as well as I know you loved that……….
Grumpy Old Gooner - September 19, 2006 09:53 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flava Flav @ Sep 19 2006, 10:27 AM) |
| QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 19 2006, 10:02 AM) | | QUOTE (gunnerforlife @ Sep 19 2006, 06:18 AM) | | does the swearing thing really matter? Even with the word filter, you still manage to get whatever you wanted to say across. |
I think we should be able to call a frelling daffodil a frelling daffodil and a wibbling turnip a wibbling turnip. Wangle their mooli's and trash their courgettes, thats what I say.
|
OK Coney, I will bring the wilf Thread back out as well as I know you loved that……….
|
I presume you have replaced all of the pics of the girls with pics from the chelski flower show?
Flava Flav - September 19, 2006 09:55 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 19 2006, 10:53 AM) |
| QUOTE (Flava Flav @ Sep 19 2006, 10:27 AM) | | QUOTE (Coney the Sane @ Sep 19 2006, 10:02 AM) | | QUOTE (gunnerforlife @ Sep 19 2006, 06:18 AM) | | does the swearing thing really matter? Even with the word filter, you still manage to get whatever you wanted to say across. |
I think we should be able to call a frelling daffodil a frelling daffodil and a wibbling turnip a wibbling turnip. Wangle their mooli's and trash their courgettes, thats what I say.
|
OK Coney, I will bring the wilf Thread back out as well as I know you loved that……….
|
I presume you have replaced all of the pics of the girls with pics from the chelski flower show?
|
Nope, its still full of inappropriate pictures of scattered ass……..
PGFC - September 19, 2006 09:58 AM (GMT)
Give me back my holiday snaps Flavs :angry:
Flava Flav - September 19, 2006 10:03 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (PerryGrovesfanclub @ Sep 19 2006, 10:58 AM) |
| Give me back my holiday snaps Flavs :angry: |
:lol: :lol:
Minxie - September 19, 2006 05:39 PM (GMT)
The swearing filter is a bit excessive imo.
I know there are a few minors around, but we're not in church are we?
This country is bloody PC enough as it is.
What was extremely boring though (this is a few months back I think) was the endless stream of threads with naked women.
It doesn't offend me in the least btw - I just find it very, very boring after a while.
It also coincided with you lot asking where all the female posters had gone.
Why not simply open another window and watch porn there inbetween posting here?
You men just don't know how to multitask :mwah:
PS Oh I see..so the F word is now prohibited again.
Guys, really.
Lighten up, will you.
Flava Flav - September 19, 2006 06:30 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Minxie @ Sep 19 2006, 06:39 PM) |
The swearing filter is a bit excessive imo.
I know there are a few minors around, but we're not in church are we?
This country is bloody PC enough as it is. What was extremely boring though (this is a few months back I think) was the endless stream of threads with naked women. It doesn't offend me in the least btw - I just find it very, very boring after a while.
It also coincided with you lot asking where all the female posters had gone.
Why not simply open another window and watch porn there inbetween posting here?
You men just don't know how to multitask :mwah:
PS Oh I see..so the F word is now prohibited again.
Guys, really.
Lighten up, will you. |
so you want to be able to say F*ck and C*nt (which are basiclly the only words it will change) but you dont want the WILF thread about because its boring............. I have a feeling many of the gents on here will disagree. :unsure:
We are never going to be able to win so we have packed in trying, it stays as it is for now.
Crushing Bore - September 19, 2006 07:10 PM (GMT)
I would never use the "c" word as it offends 99.9% of the female population. I do think fck and wnk are pretty much what most people are used to these days.
I don't mind filtering but sorry, "frelling" and "feck" and whatever else is used as alternatives really don't have the impact. It reminds me of that ITC advert from a few years ago where the Sweeney get a gang of villains in a shed up at Heathrow, counting out the fivers when the handcuffs lock again and the evil heavy guy says: "ouch that really chafes". Classic. Why not just ask the poster to re-phrase?
Flava Flav - September 19, 2006 07:23 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Bad Badger @ Sep 19 2006, 08:10 PM) |
I would never use the "c" word as it offends 99.9% of the female population. I do think fck and wnk are pretty much what most people are used to these days.
I don't mind filtering but sorry, "frelling" and "feck" and whatever else is used as alternatives really don't have the impact. It reminds me of that ITC advert from a few years ago where the Sweeney get a gang of villains in a shed up at Heathrow, counting out the fivers when the handcuffs lock again and the evil heavy guy says: "ouch that really chafes". Classic. Why not just ask the poster to re-phrase? |
Because then we would be forever sending PM's and editing posts.............seriously what does it matter??? If you cant expres yourself without swearing then there is nothing we can do about it
Crushing Bore - September 19, 2006 07:58 PM (GMT)
606 has a facility to ask you to re-phrase before it allows you to post. No PM's and no time wasted editing. As it is a word filter accessory, I am sure GW could offer it as well. That for me would be far better option than all the frelling, but if you can't, you can't.
Does it matter seriously? As I don't need to use expletives that often I won't get too hung up about it, but I would nonetheless prefer to use my own words than something chucked in that dramatically reduces the impact.
Is anyone actually reading my posts you may ask? Probably not.
:)
Flava Flav - September 19, 2006 08:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Bad Badger @ Sep 19 2006, 08:58 PM) |
606 has a facility to ask you to re-phrase before it allows you to post. No PM's and no time wasted editing. As it is a word filter accessory, I am sure GW could offer it as well. That for me would be far better option than all the frelling, but if you can't, you can't.
Does it matter seriously? As I don't need to use expletives that often I won't get too hung up about it, but I would nonetheless prefer to use my own words than something chucked in that dramatically reduces the impact.
Is anyone actually reading my posts you may ask? Probably not.
:) |
but by your point if we were to edit it or a pre-mod tool were to change it the same outcome is there?
Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) - September 19, 2006 08:06 PM (GMT)
606 has been coughing up blood for months and has now finally been put out of our misery.
But in the old days, people loved it. And most people here used to be there. And you couldn't say half the words on 606 that we allow. We have put filters in for a few of the worst swearwords but you're far free-er to say things here than you ever could on 606 in its hey-day. I don't think we can implement the 606-style functionality where it asks you to rephrase your posts. Remember this is an Invision board and we can only use the functionality Invision provides. I've bolted on a couple of things like the menu and the ability to change colour, but we're limited in what we can do.
When the swear filter was first put in it did go a bit over the top, even quite mild swearing was filtered. But after a few people commented we changed it and now only a few of the most extreme words are changed.
I don't think it's such a big ask to expect people to express themselves without f'ing and blinding all the time. We do have some quite young posters on here.