Title: Hawkeye plans halted
Gooner4Life84 - March 8, 2008 02:17 PM (GMT)
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=514626&cc=5739
Oh...
That`s a shame. Because i think the goalline technology would solve alot of issues as to wether the ball crossed the line or not.
Certainly better than 2 assistant refs standing behind each goalline <_<
Oh...
That`s a shame. Because i think the goalline technology would solve alot of issues as to wether the ball crossed the line or not.
Certainly better than 2 assistant refs standing behind each goalline <_<
Where's my username gone? - March 12, 2008 04:48 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Gooner4Life84 @ Mar 8 2008, 02:17 PM) |
| That`s a shame. Because i think the goalline technology would solve alot of issues as to wether the ball crossed the line or not. |
;)
Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) - March 13, 2008 11:10 AM (GMT)
This is the one bit of technology which I think would help and should be brought in at the top level. It's not subjective, either the ball DID cross the line or it didn't.
I'm not sure I want to see the game stopped at other times for video refs to scrutinise things but I do think they could do more to punish or exonerate people after the game.
I'm not sure I want to see the game stopped at other times for video refs to scrutinise things but I do think they could do more to punish or exonerate people after the game.
Gooner4Life84 - March 13, 2008 06:24 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Where's my username gone? @ Mar 12 2008, 04:48 PM) | ||
;) |
Yeah i am.
Where's my username gone? - March 16, 2008 10:45 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Gooner4Life84 @ Mar 13 2008, 06:24 PM) | ||||
Yeah i am. |
Right. Yeah...
:getcoat: