Title: Five minutes
Stephen McTowelie - April 21, 2009 09:07 PM (GMT)
Honestly, where did that come from?
No long injuries, very few stoppages. Baffling.
Xaviola - April 21, 2009 09:09 PM (GMT)
It's Ferguson's special stopwatch I tell you!
Gary the Gooner - April 21, 2009 09:09 PM (GMT)
makes no difference, we didn't hold out for 2 min of IT
Alias - April 21, 2009 09:09 PM (GMT)
adzzzbatch - April 21, 2009 09:17 PM (GMT)
Was a complete load of bollocks but woudln't have made much difference, out defence made sure of that.
Let's Twat These Twats™ - April 21, 2009 09:17 PM (GMT)
It's Up For Grabs Now - April 21, 2009 09:19 PM (GMT)
To be fair there is suppsoed to be 30 secs for every substitution and goal, not that it usually is taken into account..
Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) - April 21, 2009 09:20 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (It's Up For Grabs Now @ Apr 21 2009, 10:19 PM) |
| To be fair there is suppsoed to be 30 secs for every substitution and goal, not that it usually is taken into account.. |
Is that so? I knew about the substitute thing, didn't know about the goal thing though.
Kinda makes sense I guess.
McNamara That Ghost... - April 21, 2009 09:58 PM (GMT)
Adding time for scoring a goal seems a bit weird, it can effectively end up as punishment for scoring one.
:unsure:
adzzzbatch - April 21, 2009 10:04 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (McNamara That Ghost... @ Apr 21 2009, 10:58 PM) |
Adding time for scoring a goal seems a bit weird, it can effectively end up as punishment for scoring one.
:unsure: |
Honestly never thought of it that way.
Jack Bauer - April 21, 2009 10:05 PM (GMT)
Worse decision ever, really.
Howard Webb is a prick as well.
Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) - April 21, 2009 10:19 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (McNamara That Ghost... @ Apr 21 2009, 10:58 PM) |
Adding time for scoring a goal seems a bit weird, it can effectively end up as punishment for scoring one.
:unsure: |
Hmm. That seems like an odd way of looking at it.
When you score the play stops for a good minute or more while the players cavort around. Adding 30 seconds to the game to account for that doesn't seem so unreasonable.
McNamara That Ghost... - April 21, 2009 10:47 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) @ Apr 21 2009, 11:19 PM) |
| QUOTE (McNamara That Ghost... @ Apr 21 2009, 10:58 PM) | Adding time for scoring a goal seems a bit weird, it can effectively end up as punishment for scoring one.
:unsure: |
Hmm. That seems like an odd way of looking at it.
When you score the play stops for a good minute or more while the players cavort around. Adding 30 seconds to the game to account for that doesn't seem so unreasonable.
|
Maybe it's different there at the ground but I don't think it's near a minute celebrating, it might seem like that because of the replays after. Anyway the ref usually hurries the celebrating players up within ten seconds of scoring in any case!
McNamara That Ghost... - April 21, 2009 11:20 PM (GMT)
Interesting.
| QUOTE |
Allowance is made in either period for all time lost through:
substitution(s);
assessment of injury to players;
removal of injured players from the field of play for treatment;
wasting time;
any other cause.
The allowance for time lost is at the discretion of the referee.
http://www.fifa.com/flash/lotg/football/en/Laws7_02.htm |
So there isn't any specific in the rules about adding time for goals scored except for it (presumably) falling under the very vague 'any other cause' or 'The allowance for time lost is at the discretion of the referee'.
Xaviola - April 22, 2009 09:33 AM (GMT)
Webb did tell us to stop timewasting a couple of times, probably added a bit of time for that too.
Let's Twat These Twats™ - April 22, 2009 09:51 AM (GMT)
Cesc was being a bit of a dick with the time wasting stuff, tbh. :lol: