View Full Version: Professor Steven Jones Thread

July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum > 911 > Professor Steven Jones Thread



Title: Professor Steven Jones Thread
Description: Professor's paper not peer-reviewed


The Antagonist - November 29, 2006 04:11 AM (GMT)
I've encountered the name Professor Steven Jones a lot in connection with the events of 11th September 2001, although I don't specifically remember reading anything that he's ever written, or listening to, or watching anything he's said, except for the link below. However, it appears that Mr Jones has been claiming a 9/11 article of his has been peer-reviewed when, in fact, no such thing is the case.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVlMonWMMzg

Maybe someone who is familiar with Jones' work could provide a little more context and background to this revelation?

Edit: If this is the guy that claims Jesus visited America, then don't worry about providing further context.

matt - November 29, 2006 10:56 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
If this is the guy that claims Jesus visited America, then don't worry about providing further context

yes, yes he is

Kier - November 29, 2006 10:59 AM (GMT)
LOL I found that out, too, from asking around this morning. I think Jones' cold fusion work and the fact that he's a Mormon has kind of been his undoing, in terms of getting people to take him seriously. Although Judy Woods and the beam weapon theory might take the heat off him for a while !

matt - November 29, 2006 11:41 AM (GMT)
cold fusion has been seriously 'op-ed' why ? why bother ? it's all nonsense right ? well, i'm not so sure...jones has made it clear that 'his' fusion is the 'real' one (even though it does not work), and somewhat tastily, that discredits him before he even starts talking about the strange collapse of the wtc complex

some are of the opinion that what he's been lined up to do to the ask awkward questions movement is the same exact thing as with fusion - i.e. there is something to it in both cases, and he's not what he pretends to be

anyone who's looked into sonoluminescence, cavitation and similar physical 'oddities' knows that there really is some strange shit in the physical universe that we don't yet grasp

bottom line, is why go to so much trouble to discredit something that should be able to discredit itself - i think the answer is self evident

lol, wtf do they mean by 'beam weapons', that's been seriously doing the rounds at BFN too... http://www.breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopi...&highlight=beam http://www.breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopi...&highlight=beam ...as far as i can tell you, scalar* weapons in orbit might have been used to assist the fall of the towers, but as i was saying to someone the other day - "so what, no way to prove it, better to move on to what you can prove"

*sixth post down page

fedor - November 29, 2006 05:01 PM (GMT)
I'm not to fond of the space beams theory but whatever was used to destroy the WTC complex is beyond anything thing we've witnessed in public before.

HUMINT has some good analysis.

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/

suspecta - November 30, 2006 10:32 AM (GMT)
I've seen a dvd of a long Steven Jones lecture and thought it was absolutely brilliant; he's very, very passionate about this subject. He delivered the evidence painstakingly and at great length, interspersed with little bursts of humour and incredulity at the idea of anybody ever thinking they could get away with it without detection or at the very least suspicion.

It's very unfortunate that he's a Mormon but it really shouldn't make any difference. All religions require you to believe fantastical stuff and to be quite honest I don't think Mormonism is any more bizarre than any other religion including Christianity. After all, George Bush is supposedly a born-again; say no more. Ahmedinejad wrote a brilliant letter yesterday and he's a devout Muslim. Being a devout practtioner of any religion doesn't seem to warp your thinking particularly in my view - unless you're a born-again Christian :lol: and I've even met some decent left wing born-agains (though not many).

As for the beam theory, I'm encountering more and more people who believe it; it's hardly doing the cause any good and could all be part of a deliberate disinformation campaign. Who knows? It's all getting very confusing out there, that's for sure.

Anyway, to anyone attempting to rubbish Steven Jones because of his Mormonism a sharp reply mentioning George Bush's bizarre religious views ought to redress the balance. And he needs to get that report peer-reviewed - pronto.

Suspecta

Bridget - November 30, 2006 10:37 AM (GMT)
QUOTE ("suspecta")
Ahmedinejad wrote a brilliant letter yesterday

I was looking for this yesterday and it wasn't on his blog, do you have a link?

Kier - November 30, 2006 11:15 AM (GMT)
Hi Suspecta,

It's a good point about the religion being irrelevant, and GWB being a christian, but most people I've discussed Jones with feel the same way about Bush as they do about Jones anyway! People unfortunately do judge on aspects other than someone's specific research, and his statement that Jesus went to America is pretty off-putting for those who can't see the relevance of religion. A lot of people can't reconcile science and religion at all, so you can see how it might make his peers, and others, sceptical over his work.

You say yourself "All religions require you to believe fantastical stuff", so can you see why ohers might think his theories about the WTC might be considered "fantastical stuff" too, if he's capable of believing in such things? It shouldn't make a difference, you're right, but it does.

Kier


Dave52 - November 30, 2006 12:00 PM (GMT)
Improbable Collapse is his work, I found it an excellent documentary on the collapse of the twin towers and wtc7.

Google Video Here

Although the 911 Mysteries is also excellent.

911 Mysteries Google Vid here

I don't know much about Prof Jones' background, or his other beliefs, but that shouldn't get in the way of his input into the 9/11 Scholars thing.

matt - November 30, 2006 12:03 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Dave52 @ Nov 30 2006, 12:00 PM)
I don't know much about Prof Jones' background, or his other beliefs, but that shouldn't get in the way of his input into the 9/11 Scholars thing.

no Dave, you're right it shouldn't, but unfortunately it can and is being used against him

Dave52 - November 30, 2006 12:25 PM (GMT)
I agree, there are quite a few things that I hear (or read) about "truthers", and I shake my head. There seems to be quite a lot of people who set themselves up for ridicule in this business.

But on the flip side, if someone believes that a magic beam weapon was used to bring down those towers it is their right to say so. I've started getting into the Illuminati subject. Do I think that inter-dimensional lizard beings are running the world? Probably not, but Icke has alot of other interesting things to say. Incidently, it's not just Icke that I'm looking at, I just use him as he's a classic example of an easily ridiculed character.

:rolleyes:

matt - November 30, 2006 01:15 PM (GMT)
what i think there is a lack of, is a lack of people qualified/willing/determined/focused/motivated/independant enough to drive this thing forward, but who at the same time don't 'start believing', or have long held beliefs in sparkly elves of some description or other

icke is a classic example, he does as you say, have strong info on the whole masonic thing, but 'patching' and phase-shifting-other-dimensional-beings is simply too kooky...and notice also how he actually goes some way to distancing himself from those claims, saying "i know this is 'loony' talk, but i'm just telling you what i've been told"

alan watt is another who has a lot of insight into the masonic thing, but his whole dowdy "they're chemtrailing us to death" illuminati trip is another scare-op...it is likely, very likely, in fact to some degree proven that various masonic orders are used to control, disseminate plans, organise and structure influence and so on, invisible tendrils running through many disparate elements of society, but the idea that this 'pyramid' is some indestructible force, is to my mind, nonsense, they 'sit atop' of all of us, they are therefore in a potentially very weak position

if only the good prof had no religious beliefs and had no previous with the ridiculed fusion thing, if only a certain truther had not 'begun' to have leanings towards a certain religion

the beam weapon thing is quite dodgy, as i've said before, a scalar wave (invisible/silent/very difficult to detect) might have been useful, if sent from directly above from an orbiting platform, but so many posters on this subject are talking about 'beams', as far as i know, it is not a 'beam', and one poster elsewhere was referring to 'beamers' fitted into the wtc7 - just makes no sense to me, but 'discombobulating' the wtc twins from above makes some logical sense

a scalar wave is akin to a localised, focused earthquake, or infrasound/sonic fluctuation which can be increased in intensity until the resonance overcomes the structural integrity of say, a reinforced concrete building, suppose that the steel skeleton had been 'dissected' moments before, and you can see how what i describe could be what we all saw on our tvs back then

*but as with my masons speculations, this is based on what knowledge of scalar energy etc that i have, i'm not getting religious at anyone :rolleyes:

suspecta - November 30, 2006 02:10 PM (GMT)
Hi Bridget

Here's the letter:

QUOTE
Editor's note: This is the full text of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's open letter to "the American People," as supplied to CNN.]

(CNN) -- In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

O, Almighty God, bestow upon humanity the perfect human being promised to all by You, and make us among his followers.

Noble Americans,

Were we not faced with the activities of the US administration in this part of the world and the negative ramifications of those activities on the daily lives of our peoples, coupled with the many wars and calamities caused by the US administration as well as the tragic consequences of US interference in other countries;

Were the American people not God-fearing, truth-loving, and justice-seeking, while the US administration actively conceals the truth and impedes any objective portrayal of current realities;

And if we did not share a common responsibility to promote and protect freedom and human dignity and integrity;

Then, there would have been little urgency to have a dialogue with you.

While Divine providence has placed Iran and the United States geographically far apart, we should be cognizant that human values and our common human spirit, which proclaim the dignity and exalted worth of all human beings, have brought our two great nations of Iran and the United States closer together.

Both our nations are God-fearing, truth-loving and justice-seeking, and both seek dignity, respect and perfection.

Both greatly value and readily embrace the promotion of human ideals such as compassion, empathy, respect for the rights of human beings, securing justice and equity, and defending the innocent and the weak against oppressors and bullies.

We are all inclined towards the good, and towards extending a helping hand to one another, particularly to those in need.

We all deplore injustice, the trampling of peoples' rights and the intimidation and humiliation of human beings.

We all detest darkness, deceit, lies and distortion, and seek and admire salvation, enlightenment, sincerity and honesty.

The pure human essence of the two great nations of Iran and the United States testify to the veracity of these statements.

Noble Americans,

Our nation has always extended its hand of friendship to all other nations of the world.

Hundreds of thousands of my Iranian compatriots are living amongst you in friendship and peace, and are contributing positively to your society. Our people have been in contact with you over the past many years and have maintained these contacts despite the unnecessary restrictions of US authorities.

As mentioned, we have common concerns, face similar challenges, and are pained by the sufferings and afflictions in the world.

We, like you, are aggrieved by the ever-worsening pain and misery of the Palestinian people. Persistent aggressions by the Zionists are making life more and more difficult for the rightful owners of the land of Palestine. In broad day-light, in front of cameras and before the eyes of the world, they are bombarding innocent defenseless civilians, bulldozing houses, firing machine guns at students in the streets and alleys, and subjecting their families to endless grief.

No day goes by without a new crime.

Palestinian mothers, just like Iranian and American mothers, love their children, and are painfully bereaved by the imprisonment, wounding and murder of their children. What mother wouldn't?

For 60 years, the Zionist regime has driven millions of the inhabitants of Palestine out of their homes. Many of these refugees have died in the Diaspora and in refugee camps. Their children have spent their youth in these camps and are aging while still in the hope of returning to homeland.

You know well that the US administration has persistently provided blind and blanket support to the Zionist regime, has emboldened it to continue its crimes, and has prevented the UN Security Council from condemning it.

Who can deny such broken promises and grave injustices towards humanity by the US administration?

Governments are there to serve their own people. No people wants to side with or support any oppressors. But regrettably, the US administration disregards even its own public opinion and remains in the forefront of supporting the trampling of the rights of the Palestinian people.

Let's take a look at Iraq. Since the commencement of the US military presence in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed, maimed or displaced. Terrorism in Iraq has grown exponentially. With the presence of the US military in Iraq, nothing has been done to rebuild the ruins, to restore the infrastructure or to alleviate poverty. The US Government used the pretext of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but later it became clear that that was just a lie and a deception.

Although Saddam was overthrown and people are happy about his departure, the pain and suffering of the Iraqi people has persisted and has even been aggravated.

In Iraq, about one hundred and fifty thousand American soldiers, separated from their families and loved ones, are operating under the command of the current US administration. A substantial number of them have been killed or wounded and their presence in Iraq has tarnished the image of the American people and government.

Their mothers and relatives have, on numerous occasions, displayed their discontent with the presence of their sons and daughters in a land thousands of miles away from US shores. American soldiers often wonder why they have been sent to Iraq.

I consider it extremely unlikely that you, the American people, consent to the billions of dollars of annual expenditure from your treasury for this military misadventure.

Noble Americans,

You have heard that the US administration is kidnapping its presumed opponents from across the globe and arbitrarily holding them without trial or any international supervision in horrendous prisons that it has established in various parts of the world. God knows who these detainees actually are, and what terrible fate awaits them.

You have certainly heard the sad stories of the Guantanamo and Abu-Ghraib prisons. The US administration attempts to justify them through its proclaimed "war on terror." But every one knows that such behavior, in fact, offends global public opinion, exacerbates resentment and thereby spreads terrorism, and tarnishes the US image and its credibility among nations.

The US administration's illegal and immoral behavior is not even confined to outside its borders. You are witnessing daily that under the pretext of "the war on terror," civil liberties in the United States are being increasingly curtailed. Even the privacy of individuals is fast losing its meaning. Judicial due process and fundamental rights are trampled upon. Private phones are tapped, suspects are arbitrarily arrested, sometimes beaten in the streets, or even shot to death.

I have no doubt that the American people do not approve of this behavior and indeed deplore it.

The US administration does not accept accountability before any organization, institution or council. The US administration has undermined the credibility of international organizations, particularly the United Nations and its Security Council. But, I do not intend to address all the challenges and calamities in this message.

The legitimacy, power and influence of a government do not emanate from its arsenals of tanks, fighter aircrafts, missiles or nuclear weapons. Legitimacy and influence reside in sound logic, quest for justice and compassion and empathy for all humanity. The global position of the United States is in all probability weakened because the administration has continued to resort to force, to conceal the truth, and to mislead the American people about its policies and practices.

Undoubtedly, the American people are not satisfied with this behavior and they showed their discontent in the recent elections. I hope that in the wake of the mid-term elections, the administration of President Bush will have heard and will heed the message of the American people.

My questions are the following:

Is there not a better approach to governance?

Is it not possible to put wealth and power in the service of peace, stability, prosperity and the happiness of all peoples through a commitment to justice and respect for the rights of all nations, instead of aggression and war?

We all condemn terrorism, because its victims are the innocent.

But, can terrorism be contained and eradicated through war, destruction and the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocents?

If that were possible, then why has the problem not been resolved?

The sad experience of invading Iraq is before us all.

What has blind support for the Zionists by the US administration brought for the American people? It is regrettable that for the US administration, the interests of these occupiers supersedes the interests of the American people and of the other nations of the world.

What have the Zionists done for the American people that the US administration considers itself obliged to blindly support these infamous aggressors? Is it not because they have imposed themselves on a substantial portion of the banking, financial, cultural and media sectors?

I recommend that in a demonstration of respect for the American people and for humanity, the right of Palestinians to live in their own homeland should be recognized so that millions of Palestinian refugees can return to their homes and the future of all of Palestine and its form of government be determined in a referendum. This will benefit everyone.

Now that Iraq has a Constitution and an independent Assembly and Government, would it not be more beneficial to bring the US officers and soldiers home, and to spend the astronomical US military expenditures in Iraq for the welfare and prosperity of the American people? As you know very well, many victims of Katrina continue to suffer, and countless Americans continue to live in poverty and homelessness.

I'd also like to say a word to the winners of the recent elections in the US:

The United States has had many administrations; some who have left a positive legacy, and others that are neither remembered fondly by the American people nor by other nations.

Now that you control an important branch of the US Government, you will also be held to account by the people and by history.

If the US Government meets the current domestic and external challenges with an approach based on truth and Justice, it can remedy some of the past afflictions and alleviate some of the global resentment and hatred of America. But if the approach remains the same, it would not be unexpected that the American people would similarly reject the new electoral winners, although the recent elections, rather than reflecting a victory, in reality point to the failure of the current administration's policies. These issues had been extensively dealt with in my letter to President Bush earlier this year.

To sum up:

It is possible to govern based on an approach that is distinctly different from one of coercion, force and injustice.

It is possible to sincerely serve and promote common human values, and honesty and compassion.

It is possible to provide welfare and prosperity without tension, threats, imposition or war.

It is possible to lead the world towards the aspired perfection by adhering to unity, monotheism, morality and spirituality and drawing upon the teachings of the Divine Prophets.

Then, the American people, who are God-fearing and followers of Divine religions, will overcome every difficulty.

What I stated represents some of my anxieties and concerns.

I am confident that you, the American people, will play an instrumental role in the establishment of justice and spirituality throughout the world. The promises of the Almighty and His prophets will certainly be realized, Justice and Truth will prevail and all nations will live a true life in a climate replete with love, compassion and fraternity.

The US governing establishment, the authorities and the powerful should not choose irreversible paths. As all prophets have taught us, injustice and transgression will eventually bring about decline and demise. Today, the path of return to faith and spirituality is open and unimpeded.

We should all heed the Divine Word of the Holy Qur'an:

"But those who repent, have faith and do good may receive Salvation. Your Lord, alone, creates and chooses as He will, and others have no part in His choice; Glorified is God and Exalted above any partners they ascribe to Him." (28:67-68)

I pray to the Almighty to bless the Iranian and American nations and indeed all nations of the world with dignity and success.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran
29 November 2006


cheers

Suspecta




Hosted for free by InvisionFree